HR COMPLIANCE ON BENEFITS, WAGES, AND COMPENSATION FOR CONTINGENT WORKERS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MALAYSIA'S LEGAL FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEMP.935022Keywords:
Contingent Workers, Employment Act 1955, Gig Economy, HR Compliance, Malaysia Labor Law, Worker MisclassificationAbstract
The exponential growth of contingent work arrangements in Malaysia's digital economy has exposed significant gaps in the nation's labor law framework. This paper critically examines human resource compliance concerning benefits, wages, and compensation for contingent workers including freelancers, gig workers, and independent contractors within Malaysia's regulatory landscape. Drawing upon statutory analysis, case law examination, and comparative regulatory approaches, this study argues that the Employment Act 1955's binary classification system (employee versus independent contractor) is fundamentally inadequate for addressing the realities of contemporary contingent work. The paper critiques recent legislative developments, including the Gig Workers Act 2026, while proposing comprehensive reforms to ensure equitable protection for Malaysia's contingent workforce. The analysis reveals that current compliance mechanisms place disproportionate burdens on workers while providing employers with ambiguous safe harbors, ultimately perpetuating systemic vulnerabilities among approximately 1.2 million Malaysian gig workers.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, A., Ismail, M., & Zulkifli, M. (2017). Compliance with Malaysian employment law: The influence of culture on HR practices. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(4), 601-617.
Alzahrani, R. A. S., & Abdullah, M. I. B. (2026). Strategic human resource practices and organizational change: A conceptual framework of leadership mediation in SMEs. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 18(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.70917/ijcisim-2026-3031
Ayadurai, D. (2023). The Employment Act 1955: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). LexisNexis.
Azeez, S. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2026). HRM practices and employee retention: A review of literature. International Journal of Management, 17(4), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM_17_04_003
De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471-504.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2025). Gig economy statistics 2025. Department of Statistics Malaysia.
Dubal, V. B. (2023). On the gig economy and the future of work. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19, 235-254.
European Parliament. (2024). Directive (EU) 2024/168 on improving working conditions in platform work. Official Journal of the European Union.
Freedland, M., & Kountouris, N. (2017). The legal construction of personal work relations. Oxford University Press.
Hassan, M. N. (2015). The legal classification of contingent workers in Malaysia: A case law analysis. Malaysian Journal of Law and Society, 22, 67-84.
Hassan, M. N. (2022). The legal classification of contingent workers in Malaysia: A case law analysis. Malaysian Journal of Law and Society, 30, 65-88.
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83-119.
Kalleberg, A. L. (2018). Precarious lives: Job insecurity and well-being in rich democracies. Polity Press.
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). Understanding trends in alternative work arrangements in the United States. ILR Review, 72(2), 382-416.
Khazanah Research Institute. (2024). The state of households: Workers in transition. Khazanah Research Institute.
Lee, S. Y. (2024). Regulating platform work in Southeast Asia: A comparative assessment. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 19(1), 98-125.
Maidin, A. J. (2018). Industrial relations law in Malaysia (3rd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Manky, O., & Jamil, R. (2023). Algorithmic management and worker classification in Southeast Asian platform economies. Work, Employment and Society, 37(4), 892-911.
Ministry of Human Resources. (2023). Guidelines on the Employment (Amendment) Act 2022. Ministry of Human Resources.
Parliament of Malaysia. (2026). Gig Workers Act 2026 (Act XXX). Percetakan Nasional Malaysia.
Ramasamy, S., & Singh, K. (2023). The gig economy and social protection in Malaysia: Policy options and recommendations. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 40(2), 156-178.
Rasiah, R., & Chandran, V. G. R. (2019). Policies for inclusive development: Labor market regulations and worker protections in Malaysia. Asian Development Review, 36(1), 1-22.
Social Security Appellate Board. (2023). Decision No. SSAB/23/2023 (Unreported).
Tan, C. S. (2020). Legal challenges and protections for contingent workers in Malaysia: A critical analysis. Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 35(1), 45-68.
World Bank. (2022). Malaysia economic monitor: Digital economy and labor markets. World Bank Group.
Yaacob, N., Ahmad, N. A., & Ramlan, M. N. (2025). Impact of home office work arrangements on employee work performance in Malaysia: The mediating role of burnout. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies, 32(1), 112–128.
List of Cases
Chee Weng Chong v. Global Industries Sdn Bhd [2018] 1 LNS 1245
David Vanniasingham Ramanathan v. Subang Jaya Medical Centre Sdn Bhd [2013] 1 ILR 616
Lee Swee Seng & Anor v. Fairview Schools (M) Sdn Bhd [2017] 1 ILR 289
Loh Guet Ching v. Menteri Sumber Manusia & Ors [2021] 1 LNS 823
Mohd Radzi Musa v. Malaysia Aviation System & Anor [2014]
Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison Ltd v. MacDonald & Evans [1952] 1 TLR 101
