POST-PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT: AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, RESILIENCE, AND HUMAN-CENTRIC DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEMP.935024Keywords:
Dynamic Capabilities, Human-Centric Digital Transformation, Organizational Resilience, Post-Pandemic Management, Socio-Technical SystemsAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the phenomenon of organisational change. Yet, the post-pandemic management scholarship remains fragmented in terms of the integration of resilience, digital transformation, and human-centric approaches. The existing literature has tended to focus on short-term solutions to crises, revealing a major lack in the development of long-term, adaptive management models to assure sustainable performance and manage uncertainty. This conceptual paper suggests an integrated paradigm for post-pandemic management, based on the theories of dynamic capacities, organisational resilience and socio-technical systems. The main point is that organisations must go beyond reactive measures by aligning three key dimensions: adaptive resilience, digital capabilities creation, and employee-centered management practices. While past research has looked at these aspects individually, this paper argues that their synergistic interdependence forms a higher-order competence necessary for managing post-pandemic volatility. Conceptually, the paper proposes a triadic integrative model that conceptualises resilience as an embedded dynamic capability in digitally enabled and human-centric organisational systems. In this study, we contribute to overcoming theoretical silos and broadening post-crisis management discourse towards a holistic and future-oriented paradigm. This is important because it provides a systematic structure for scholars and practitioners in building sustainable, adaptive, and inclusive management methods to respond to ongoing disturbances and improve organisational performance in the post-pandemic era.
Downloads
References
Arndt, F., Ng, W., & Xu, Y. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance during environmental turbulence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 60(2), 432–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12856
Carnevale, J. B., & Hatak, I. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037
Crayne, M. P., & Medeiros, K. E. (2021). Making sense of chaos: Resilience and crisis management in organizations. American Psychologist, 76(3), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000715
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0099-9
Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12239
Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Cascio, W. F., De Cieri, H., Demerouti, E., Gerpott, F. H., van Ginkel, C. O., Greer, L. L., Hu, J., Lakshman, S., Preena, S., Prasad, S., Roggema, A., & Vugt, M. V. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.03
Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2020). The role of emerging technologies in accelerating the transition to a sustainable post-COVID-19 world: Theoretical discussions and prospects for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102126
Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J.-F. (2019). The new world of digital work: Transitions, technostress and teleworking. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12148
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Vial, G. (2019). Digital transformation: A review of the current state of knowledge and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Wenzel, M., Stanske, S., & Lieberman, M. B. (2021). Strategic responses to crisis. Strategic Management Journal, 42(2), V1–V18. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3161
Zhang, J., & Chen, G. (2023). Human-centric digital transformation: Navigating the socio-technical complexities of the future workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2173562
