CURRENT PRACTICES, CHALLENGES, AND TRENDS IN INTEGRATED CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT IN PRIMARY EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1163046

Keywords:

Assessment, Educational Assessment Challenges, Integrated Curriculum, Interdisciplinary Assessment, Primary Education

Abstract

In educational context, the adoption of integrated curricula aims to help students make connections between concepts across academic subjects and real-world applications. However, given the nature of integrated curricula that combine multiple disciplines, assessing student learning within this framework is challenging. Therefore, using the systematic review process outlined by the PRISMA guidelines, this review identifies 9 eligible articles that meet the criteria from 283 published between 2013 and 2025. This review found that some assessment methods are traditional and standardized, while others are more flexible and focus on real-world projects that allow students to apply their knowledge and skills outside of the classroom. There appears to be a clear trend toward combining rigid, structured assessment processes with flexible, real world-based processes that utilize technology to improve the entire range of learning outcomes more effectively. Tools commonly used for assessment include formal assessment frameworks and classroom instruments that assess skills such as critical thinking and collaboration. The findings of this systematic review also provide evidence in the assessment of integrated curriculum learning outcomes, such as misalignment between the objectives of integrated curricula and existing examination-oriented assessment systems, a lack of validated assessment frameworks, difficulties in measuring multidimensional learning outcomes, and inadequate teacher preparedness for interdisciplinary assessment. All of these challenges demonstrate a significant gap between theoretical advancements in integrated learning and the practical implementation of assessment strategies in educational settings. Therefore, to develop more effective assessments for integrated curricula in primary education, it is necessary to align the curriculum, teaching practices, and assessments. These efforts are better supported by robust frameworks, improved teacher training, and effective policy integration to ensure accurate evaluation of students’ competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Razak, R., Yusoff, S. M., Leng, C. H., & Marzaini, A. F. M. (2023). Evaluating teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in implementing classroom-based assessment: A case study among ESL secondary school teachers in Selangor, Malaysia. PLOS ONE, 18(12), e0293325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293325

Abdurrahman, A. (2022). Integrated science curriculum in the unpredictable world. In N. Rezaei (Ed.), Integrated education and learning (Vol. 13, pp. 181–199). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15963-3_11

Abu Kassim, M. H. A., & Ariffin, A. (2025). Product evaluation of Malay language curriculum in primary schools from teachers’ perspectives based on CIPP model. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 994–1014.

Agudelo Rodríguez, C. M., González-Reyes, R. A., Bernal Ballen, A., Merchán Merchán, M. A., & López Barrera, E. A. (2024). Characterization of STEM teacher education programs for disciplinary integration: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), em2408. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14280

Akib, E., Imran, M. E., Mahtari, S., Mahmud, M. R., Prawiyogy, A. G., Supriatna, I., & Ikhsan, M. H. (2020). Study on implementation of integrated curriculum in Indonesia. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i1.24

Alali, R. (2024). Enhancing 21st century skills through integrated STEM education using project-oriented problem-based learning. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 53(2), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53205-1217

Allouch, S., Ali, R. M., Al-Wattary, N., Nomikos, M., & Abu-Hijleh, M. F. (2024). Tools for measuring curriculum integration in health professions’ education: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 635. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05618-5

Asunda, P. A., & Walker, C. (2018). Integrated STEM: Views and challenges of engineering and technology education K–12 teachers. Career and Technical Education Research, 43(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.5328/cter43.2.179

Banegas, D. L., & Hemmi, C. (2021). CLIL: Present and future. In C. Hemmi & D. L. Banegas (Eds.), International perspectives on CLIL (pp. 281–295). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_14

Banegas, D. L., Poole, P. M., & Corrales, K. A. (2020). Content and language integrated learning in Latin America 2008–2018: Ten years of research and practice. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.2.4

Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791

Burke, P., & Lehane, P. (2023). Weaving the literature on integration, pedagogy and assessment: Insights for curriculum and classrooms (Report 2). https://doras.dcu.ie/29731/1/weaving-the-literature-on-integration-pedagogy-and-assessment.pdf

Chemsi, G., Elimadi, I., Sadiq, M., & Radid, M. (2024). Teaching and assessment in the era of education 5.0 (p. 436). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3045-6

Chen, B., Chen, J., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2025). The effects of integrated STEM education on K–12 students’ achievements: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251318297

Costa, M. C., Domingos, A. M. D., Teodoro, V. D., & Vinhas, É. M. R. G. (2022). Teacher professional development in STEM education: An integrated approach with real-world scenarios in Portugal. Mathematics, 10(21), 3944. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10213944

Damanhuri, M. I. M., Roslan, R., & Rivaldo, I. (2025). Challenges in chemistry teaching: A case study of academic issues and student behavior. Education in Life Sciences and Mathematics, 1(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.37134/ELSIM.vol1.1.4.2025

De Loof, H., Pauw, B., & Van Petegem, P. (2022). Integrated STEM education: The effects of a long-term intervention on students’ cognitive performance. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–17.

Delahunty, T., Prendergast, M., & Ní Ríordáin, M. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on achieving an integrated curricular model of primary STEM education in Ireland: Authentic or utopian ideology? Frontiers in Education, 6, 666608. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.666608

DeLuca, C., Willis, J., Cowie, B., Harrison, C., Coombs, A., Gibson, A., & Trask, S. (2019). Policies, programs, and practices: Exploring the complex dynamics of assessment education in teacher education across four countries. Frontiers in Education, 4, 132. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00132

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2020). 21st century competencies in light of the history of integrated curriculum. Frontiers in Education, 5, 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00122

Fielding, D. W., & Regehr, G. (2017). A call for an integrated program of assessment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(4), 77. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe81477

Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4

Giangrande, N., White, R. M., East, M., Jackson, R., Clarke, T., Saloff Coste, M., & Penha-Lopes, G. (2019). A competency framework to assess and activate education for sustainable development: Addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals 4.7 challenge. Sustainability, 11(10), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102832

Gleeson, J. (2024). Heads or tails: The relationship between curriculum and assessment in Irish post-primary education. Irish Educational Studies, 43(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2061564

González-Salamanca, J. C., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410366

Gopal, R., Maniam, M., & Nallaluthan, K. (2023). Measuring Malaysian lower secondary learners’ reading ability on a CEFR-aligned text. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 614–627. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.28013

Harris, A. M. (2019). The influence of an interdisciplinary elementary curriculum on student outcomes: Providing cognitive student learning through an integrated approach [Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://search.proquest.com/openview/a3d7269ac06ae97dafbe7603d04d42de/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The effects of integrated STEM education practices on problem solving skills, scientific creativity, and critical thinking dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358–379.

Huber, M. T., Hutchings, P., & Gale, R. (2005). Integrative learning for liberal education. Peer Review, 7(4). http://www.gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/ilp/uploads/PRSUFA05-IL.pdf

Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D., & Mereckaitė-Kušleikė, I. (2023). Conditions for successful learning of primary school pupils in the context of integrated education: A case study. Interchange, 54(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-023-09489-5

Kabir, S. M. A. (2023). English language at secondary level in Bangladesh: (Dis)connections between policy and practice of oral skills. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5761

Knoef, M. J., Visscher, A. J., Van Keulen, H., & Gijsel, M. A. R. (2024). Integrated language and science & technology instruction: A cognitive task analysis of the required teacher expertise. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(8), 883–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2024.2361980

Kuwar, R., & Acharya, N. H. (2024). Integrated curriculum: Concept, characteristics and consideration for planning and designing. ILAM इलम, 20(1), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.3126/ilam.v20i1.67318

Lo, Y. Y., & Leung, C. (2022). Conceptualising assessment literacy of teachers in content and language integrated learning programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(10), 3816–3834. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2085028

Loh, S. L., Pang, V., & Lajium, D. (2019). The planning of integrated STEM education based on standards and contextual issues of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp300-315

Marcotte, K. M., & Gruppen, L. D. (2022). Competency-based education as curriculum and assessment for integrative learning. Education Sciences, 12(4), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040267

Marshall, J. (2024). The effects of an integrated curriculum with embedded sustainability themes on teaching and learning experiences at a primary school [Doctoral dissertation, St. John’s University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://search.proquest.com/openview/df8969a93626d3300e29a31d2dabbab5/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371

Mat Yusoff, S., Abdul Razak, R., Chin, H. L., & Marzaini, A. F. (2023). Exploring teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A quantitative study in a secondary school setting. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 13(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol13.2.4.2023

Mat Yusoff, S., Chin, H. L., Abdul Razak, R., & Marzaini, A. F. M. (2023). Towards successful assessment practice: Examining secondary school teachers’ conceptions of assessment. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 11(1), 1–7.

Matinho, D., Pietrandrea, M., Echeverria, C., Helderman, R., Masters, M., Regan, D., Shu, S., Moreno, R., & McHugh, D. (2022). A systematic review of integrated learning definitions, frameworks, and practices in recent health professions education literature. Education Sciences, 12(3), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030165

Matsumoto-Royo, K., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Core practices in practice-based teacher education: A systematic literature review of its teaching and assessment process. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101047

McPhail, G. (2018). Curriculum integration in the senior secondary school: A case study in a national assessment context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1386234

Mitana, J. M. V., Muwagga, A. M., & Ssempala. (2018). Towards a holistic and relevant educational assessment in primary schools in Uganda. African Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.62.18.018

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Nguyen, G. T. C., & Thai, D. T. (2023). Integrated teaching in primary schools: A systematic review of current practices, barriers, and future developments. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 2053–2064. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.26087

Opertti, R., Kang, H., & Magni, G. (2018). Comparative analysis of the national curriculum frameworks of five countries: Brazil, Cambodia, Finland, Kenya and Peru. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. https://www.inclusive-education-in-action.org/resources/comparative-analysis-national-curriculum-frameworks-five-countries-brazil-cambodia

Pang, N. S.-K. (2022). Teachers’ reflective practices in implementing assessment for learning skills in classroom teaching. ECNU Review of Education, 5(3), 470–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936290

Pappa, C. I., Georgiou, D., & Pittich, D. (2024). Technology education in primary schools: Addressing teachers’ perceptions, perceived barriers, and needs. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(2), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09828-8

Pountney, R., & McPhail, G. (2017). Researching the interdisciplinary curriculum: The need for ‘translation devices.’ British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1068–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3299

Rhodes, M. J., Visscher, A. J., Van Keulen, H., & Gijsel, M. A. (2024). A review of the effects of integrated language, science and technology interventions in elementary education on student achievement. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 06.

Rhodes, M., Van Keulen, H., Gijsel, M., & Visscher, A. (2023). Effects of integrated language and science and technology interventions in primary education. Proceedings Book Series-III, 280.

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8

Santaolalla, E., Urosa, B., Martín, O., Verde, A., & Díaz, T. (2020). Interdisciplinarity in teacher education: Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational innovation project. Sustainability, 12(17), 6748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176748

Thanimalay, Z. D., & Alias, S. N. (2025). Assessment of critical thinking skills among Form Four physics students in Miri. Education in Life Sciences and Mathematics, 1(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.37134/ELSIM.vol1.1.3.2025

Twining, P., Butler, D., Fisser, P., Leahy, M., Shelton, C., Forget-Dubois, N., & Lacasse, M. (2021). Developing a quality curriculum in a technological era. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2285–2308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09857-3

Ye, P., & Xu, X. (2023). A case study of interdisciplinary thematic learning curriculum to cultivate “4C skills.” Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1080811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080811

Yegizbayeva, L., Admiraal, W., Zhazykova, M., Mustoyapova, A., Akiyeva, A., Nurseitova, B., & Saimagambetova, A. (2025). Analyzing CLIL studies in primary education: Bibliometric analysis. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(4), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n4a1410

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Shapri, N. I. M., Zamri, N. A. F., Samsudin, S., Kadir, W. N. H. W. A., Ahmad, A. M., & Husain, N. M. (2026). CURRENT PRACTICES, CHALLENGES, AND TRENDS IN INTEGRATED CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT IN PRIMARY EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELLING (IJEPC), 11(63). https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1163046