PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENGUJIAN INSTRUMEN KEPERLUAN MODEL PEDAGOGI TAHFIZ AL-QURAN BERINTEGRASI KONVENSIONAL DAN DIGITAL
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEEDS ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR THE INTEGRATED CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL TAHFIZ AL-QURAN PEDAGOGY MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1164098Keywords:
Cronbach's Alpha, Design and Development Research (DDR), Instrumen Keperluan (Needs Assessment Instrument), Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen (Instrument Reliability), Model Pedagogi Tahfiz al-Quran Berintegrasi Konvensional dan Digital (Integrated Conventional and Digital Tahfiz al-Quran Pedagogy Mode), Pedagogi Tahfiz (Tahfiz Pedagogy)Abstract
Pembangunan sesuatu model memerlukan instrumen pengukuran yang mempunyai tahap kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi bagi memastikan ketepatan data yang dikumpul. Dalam konteks pendidikan tahfiz, instrumen khusus untuk menilai keperluan pembangunan model pedagogi tahfiz al-Quran berintegrasi konvensional dan digital masih belum mencukupi. Oleh yang demikian, fokus utama kajian peringkat ini adalah untuk membina instrumen pengukuran serta mengesahkan aspek kesahan kandungan dan kebolehpercayaannya sebelum digunakan bagi menilai keperluan pembangunan model. Kajian rintis secara kuantitatif dengan melibatkan seramai 35 orang guru tahfiz di Selangor. Seterusnya instrumen kajian dibangunkan melalui proses adaptasi serta pengubahsuaian berdasarkan literatur berkaitan, kemudiann disemak oleh panel pakar bagi memastikan kesesuaian kandungan serta konstruk. Pada peringkat seterusnya, analisis data dijalankan menggunakan perisian IBM SPSS Statistics menerusi tiga prosedur utama, iaitu analisis kebolehpercayaan Cronbach’s Alpha, Corrected Item–Total Correlation dan Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted. Dapatan analisis terhadap instrument yang merangkumi 15 item menunjukkan nilai Cronbach’s Alpha sebanyak 0.938. Nilai tersebut mencerminkan tahap konsistensi dalaman yang sangat tinggi serta menunjukkan bahawa instrumen mempunyai nilai kebolehpercayaan yang baik. Sementara itu, nilai Corrected Item–Total Correlation bagi keseluruhan item berada dalam julat antara 0.512 hingga 0.843, manakala analisis Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted menunjukkan semua item wajar dikekalkan. Berdasarkan nilai yang diperolehi, instrumen yang dibangunkan memenuhi nilai kebolehpercayaan yang diperlukan serta mempunyai konsistensi dalaman yang sangat baik untuk pembangunan model pedagogi tahfiz al-Quran berintegrasi konvensional dan digital.
The development of a model requires a measurement instrument with a high level of reliability to ensure the accuracy of the data collected. In the context of tahfiz education, specific instruments for assessing the need to develop an integrated conventional and digital tahfiz al-Quran pedagogy model remain limited. Therefore, the main focus of this phase was to develop a measurement instrument and establish its content validity and reliability before it was used to assess the need for model development.A quantitative pilot study involving 35 tahfiz teachers in Selangor was conducted. Subsequently, the research instrument was developed through a process of adaptation and modification based on relevant literature and was then reviewed by a panel of experts to ensure the appropriateness of its content and constructs. At the next stage, data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics through three main procedures: Cronbach’s Alpha, Corrected Item–Total Correlation, and Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted.t The analysis of the 15-item instrument yielded a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.938. This value reflects a very high level of internal consistency and indicates that the instrument has good reliability. Meanwhile, the Corrected Item–Total Correlation values for all items ranged from 0.512 to 0.843, while the Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted analysis indicated that all items should be retained. Based on the values obtained, the developed instrument met the required reliability criteria and demonstrated excellent internal consistency for the development of the integrated conventional and digital tahfiz al-Quran pedagogy model.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, A., & Adam, H. H. (2022). Dasar pendidikan tahfiz negara: Perlaksanaan di kementerian pendidikan malaysia. Jurnal AL-ANWAR, 11(2).
Albert Bandura. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
AlMessabi, H. A., & Hasan, H. (2025). Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate Recruitment Practices and Organizational Performance: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i9/26457
Al-Qabisi, ʿAli ibn Muḥammad ibn Khalaf. (1955). Al-Risalah al-Mufassolah li ahwal al-Muallimin wa ahkam al-Muallimin wa al-Muta’allimin. Dar Iḥyaʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyyah.
Arbeni, W., Windiani, A., Sihotang, D. S. B., Anggraini, N., Wulandari, S., & Nugroho, A. (2025). Test Reliability Analysis in Educational Evaluation: A Quantitative Approach to Consistency and Validity. Holistic Science, 5(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.56495/hs.v5i1.838
Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
Hamzah, N. H., Ali, N. A., Kamri, N. ‘Azzah, Mohd Yusoff, M. Y., & Abdul Rahman, N. N. (2024). Empowering Tahfiz Education in Malaysia: Insights into the External Factors Driving Parental Preferences. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 39(2), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2024.39.2.2
Haron, M. Z., Haji Othman, M. K., & Awang, Mohd. I. (2019). Keperluan Penilaian Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Tahfiz Model Ulul Albab (Tmua) Sekolah Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. E-Journal.Uum.Edu.My, 1, 289–316.
Hashim, S., Maleki, N. H., Amiruddin, M. H., Ismail, M. E., & Zulkifli, N. N. (2023). Pembangunan Aplikasi Android Dalam Membantu Kanak-Kanak Prasekolah Belajar Membaca Sebagai Asas Dalam Bidang TVET. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 8(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.30880/ojtp.2023.08.01.002
Hilwa, S., Tanjung, I., & Nasution, A. (2025). The Role of Teachers and Students in the Islamic Tradition of the Classical Period. Ahlussunnah: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(3), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.58485/jie.v4i3.540
Ikhwan, A., Noh, M. A. C., & Iman, N. (2020). Implementation of the Tahfidzal-qur’an curriculumat the tahfidz malaysia boarding school. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 866–870. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.08.185
Jamil, S. R., Makhsin, M., & Mohamad, A. S. (2024). The formation of huffaz through the application of sufism concepts in tahfiz education. International Journal of Modern Education, 6(23), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.623001
Kaimin, S. K., Yussuf, A., & Mohd Yusoff, M. Y. & Z. (2025). Amalan Pembelajaran Hifz al-Quran Pelajar Tahfiz Model Ulul Albab (TMUA) Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama di Malaysia The Learning Practice of Hifz al-Qur’an among Tahfiz Model Ulul Albab (TMUA) Students at National Religious Secondary School in Malaysia. Journal of Usuluddin, 53(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol53no1.5
Kilic, S. (2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823
Kunselman, A. R. (2024). A brief overview of pilot studies and their sample size justification. Fertility and Sterility, 121(6), 899–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.040
Laila, D., Izzatul, R., & Miftah, M. (2025). Transformasi Digital di Dunia Pendidikan: Implementasi dan Dampak Teknologi Pembelajaran. Journal of Science and Technology: Alpha, 1(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.70716/alpha.v1i2.172
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382???386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Mellinger, C. D., & Hanson, T. A. (2020). Methodological considerations for survey research: Validity, reliability, and quantitative analysis. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 19. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v19i0.549
Metsämuuronen, J., & Niemensivu, T. (2025). How to Make Sense of Reliability? Common Language Interpretation of Reliability and the Relation of Reliability to Effect Size. Applied Psychological Measurement, 49(7), 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251350159
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mocorro, R. E. (2017). Pilot Study, The First Step in Research. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(12), 864–866. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20178777
Nurhayati, S., Fitri, A., Amir, R., & Zalisman, Z. (2024). Analysis of the Implementation of Training on Digital-based Learning Media to Enhance Teachers’ Digital Literacy. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4029
Nurjanah, S., Mustafa, M., & Johan, S. A. (2023). Teori Dan Model Bagi Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran (PdP) Hifz Al-Quran: Satu Tinjauan Literatur. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 5(4), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajress.2023.5.4.19
Nuryanto, A., Tatihoran, N., & Firdaus, R. (2025). Research Instrument: Instrument Development and Instrument Calibration. Al Hikmah Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Islamic Education, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35896/ijecie.v9i1.914
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. W W Norton & Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Rasyid, A., Hartanto, R., & Priyanto, C. (2025). Reliabilitas Alat Ukur, Jenis-Jenis, Cara Pengukuran, dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. TSAQOFAH, 6(2), 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i2.8511
Reichenheim, M., & Bastos, J. L. (2021). O quê, para quê e como? Desenvolvendo instrumentos de aferição em epidemiologia. Revista de Saúde Pública, 55, 40. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002813
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues (first edit). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosdiana, R., & Setiawan, H. R. (2025). Peran Pembelajaran Al-Qur’an dan Hadis dalam Pembinaan Akhlak Karimah Siswa MA Rohani Ikhwanul Muslimin. Journal of Sustainable Education, 2(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.63477/jose.v2i3.337
Saleh, M. H., Ismail, Z., & Hussin, Z. (2018). Model penilaian program tahfiz al-quran di nusantara berdasarkan model penilaian provus (discrepancy evaluation model). Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 5(2).
Shokri, S. S. M., & Salihan, S. (2023). Modul pembangunan Program Huffaz Profesional Universiti Tenaga Nasional: Satu pemerhatian kepada konstruk pembangunan Al-Quran. Firdaus Journal, 3(2), 12–23.
Siraj, S., Abdullah, M. R. T. L., & Muhamad Rozkee, R. (2023). Pendekatan peneyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan (4th ed.). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Syed Aziz, S. N., Mohd Asri, N. W., & Baharudin, L. (2025). Peranan Tekonologi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran al-Quran & al-Qiraat. QIRAAT Jurnal Al-Quran Dan Isi-Isu Kontemporari, 8(2), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.53840/qiraat.v8i2.105
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tamuri, Ab. H., Yahya, H. S., Hussin, N. H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2021). Keperluan Latihan Kemahiran Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Dalam Kalangan Guru Pendidikan Islam. Tinta Artikulasi Membina Ummah 7(1), 20211-19, e-ISSN: 2289-960X, 7(1), 1–19.
Waharjani, & Mohammad Jailani. (2024). Authenticity and Historicity of The Quran from The Perspective Of H. Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah (Buya Hamka). ISME : Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.61683/isme.vol21.2024.42-52
Yoong, S. M., Hosshan, H., Arumugam, S., Alya Qasdina Ng Ai Lee, Lau, S. C., & Govindasamy, P. (2022). Validity and Reliability of Needs Analysis Questionnaire for Dyscalculia Instrument. South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(3), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2022.3307
Zaharah Ismail, F., Hafizi Yusof, N., Farimin Ahmad Osman, A., Embong, R., Omar, N., Fathy Mohamed Abdelgelil, M., Nabilah Mohd Noor, M., Mohd Razali, T., & Abd Rashid, R. (2020). Strategi Murajaah al-Quran bagi Huffaz di Peringkat Tertiari [Strategies in Murajaah al-Quran for Huffaz at The Tertiary Level]. In BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences (Vol. 3). http://www.bitarajournal.com
