PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING BEHAVIOUR IN VIRTUAL TEAMS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1164102

Keywords:

Knowledge-Sharing Behaviour, Psychological Safety, Social Exchange Theory, Virtual Teams

Abstract

The shift to digital and hybrid work has fundamentally changed how employees communicate and share knowledge. Virtual teams bring clear advantages of flexibility and efficiency, but heavy dependence on digital platforms often diminishes face-to-face interaction and poses communication challenges. This makes workers often reluctant to share their expertise, opinions or insights. That’s why psychological safety is so important in remote environments as employees need to believe they can ask questions, express their concerns, or share new ideas without being subject to harsh criticism or judgement.  Although research on psychological safety and knowledge sharing has increased, the precise relationship between the two in virtual settings remains underexplored. This conceptual paper draws on Social Exchange Theory to examine the proposed relationship between psychological safety and knowledge-sharing behaviour in virtual teams, with psychological safety as the independent variable and knowledge sharing as the dependent variable. The framework proposed based on a narrative review suggests that employees, when they perceive safety and support, view this positive environment as a social resource and respond by proactively sharing their expertise. Ultimately, this paper provides greater theoretical insight into virtual team dynamics as well as practical strategies for managing remote staff collaboration.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(1), 81–98.

Ciby, M. A., & Dominic, E. (2026). Nurturing creative involvement at work: Role of psychological safety and happiness at work. Acta Psychologica, 262, 106105.

Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: What we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 590271.

Cooperative Orientation Matter in the Organizational Knowledge Ecosystem. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-27.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

Ford, R. C., Piccolo, R. F., & Ford, L. R. (2021). Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is key. Business Horizons, 64(2), 147–157.

Hwang, I., Kim, D., & Seo, R. (2026). Beyond the Silos: Why Justice, Safety, and

Macpherson, A., Breslin, D., & Akinci, C. (2022). Organizational learning from hidden improvisation. Organization Studies, 43(6), 861-883.

Nanduri, R. K., & Rincón, L. C. (2026). Trust, Digital Capability, and Knowledge Sharing: An Opportunity for Technological Innovation. Administrative Sciences, 16(3), 139.

Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535.

Nguyen, T. M., Siri, N. S., & Malik, A. (2022). Multilevel influences on individual knowledge sharing behaviours: the moderating effects of knowledge sharing opportunity and collectivism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(1), 70-87.

Nilawati, C., Kurniawati, D. T., & Azzuhri, M. (2026). Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior in Police Organizations: The Mediating Roles of Digital Competence and Digital Culture. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 14(1), 203-214.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Knowledge-creating Company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

O’Donovan, R., Van Dun, D., & McAuliffe, E. (2020). Measuring psychological safety in healthcare teams: developing an observational measure to complement survey methods. BMC medical research methodology, 20(1), 203

Obeng, H. A., Gyamfi, B. A., Mensah, L., Arhinful, R., & Sarwar, A. (2026). Employees’ behavioral intention to use AI and organizational efficiency in an emerging economy: The serial mediating roles of technology readiness and digital culture. Discover Artificial Intelligence.

Rajhi, M., & Aljuhmani, H. Y. (2026). Fostering Sustainable Innovation Through Communication Quality: The Sequential Role of Trust in Leadership and Organizational Commitment in Team-Based Enterprises. Sustainability, 18(2), 554.

Ullah, R., Khan, A., & Khan, N. H. (2026). The Art of Remote Leadership: A Qualitative Exploration of Virtual Team Dynamics in the Post-Pandemic Era. Pakistan Journal of Social Science Review, 5(1), 248-254.

Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.

Yang, X., & Wang, Y. (2026). The impact of digital collaboration tools on inclusive leadership in multicultural teams in the context of global remote work: a psychological perspective on empathy, cohesion, and cross cultural communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1738857.

Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., Agarwal, U. A., & Romero-Domínguez, L. (2026). Laughter in the workplace: how supervisor humour relates to employee knowledge sharing and hiding. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 18(1), 237-257.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Rasak, N. T. S., Basri, H. M., Zamri, M. N., Azmi, M. A. A. M., Suhaimi, M. M. M., & Suhaimi, M. H. (2026). PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING BEHAVIOUR IN VIRTUAL TEAMS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELLING (IJEPC), 11(64), 1848–1857. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1164102