THE STATUS OF AIRSPACE FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAVS) AND THE ISSUE OF AIRSPACE TRESPASS: THE TAWHIDIC EPISTEMOLOGY APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.1143007Keywords:
Airspace, Maqasid al-shariah, Ownership, Tawhidic, Trespass, UAVs, ‘UrfAbstract
This paper evaluates the legal status of airspace and the concept of ownership in relation to the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and the issue of trespass through the lens of Tawhidic epistemology. The current Malaysian legal framework and international level reveal a significant loophole, as the UAV operational airspace has yet to be formally declared, creating uncertainty over ownership, control, and liability. Tawhidic views the integration of ownership as trust (amanah) and serves for the public interest (maslahah). Drawing from the Islamic jurisprudence on the doctrine of ownership, this research argues that airspace governance must reflect both divine unity and human accountability. The dynamic principle of revival of dead land (ihya al-mawat) enriches this analysis by emphasising the concept of UAV airspace as mawat land that can be cultivated within the concept of ownership of airspace. Within this framework, customary practice ('urf) plays a vital role in shaping the contextual application of the rule, which is consistent with the higher objective of shariah (maqasid al-shariah). The hybrid approach of this research consequently solves the issue of airspace ownership for UAVs by combining doctrinal legal analysis with epistemological reasoning.
Downloads
References
Air Traffic Services. (2018). (Annex 11 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation). (ICAO).
Da’wah Institute of Nigeria. & Islamic Education Trust. (2015). Shari’ah intelligence the basic principles and objectives of Islamic jurisprudence. An introduction to usul al-Fiqh and maqasid al-Shari’ah. Retrieved November 11, 2025, from https://dawahinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/Shariah-Intelligence.pdf.
Halsbury’s Laws of England (4th Ed., Vol. 45). (1999). United Kingdom: Lexis Nexis.
Kamali, M. H. (2025). Goals and purposes of shariah: Maqasid in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
Kamali, MH (2019). Maqasid Al-Shariah Made Simple. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Mace, R. A. (1948). Ownership of airspace. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 17(4), 343-368.
Mahmood M Sanusi. (2006). Al-Qawa’id Al-Fiqhiyyah: Its Relevance to Malaysian Islamic Financial Products. Shariah Law Reports Articles, 3 ShLR 1.
Mek Wok Mahmud & Sayed Sikandar Shah. (2010). Optimisation of philanthropic waqf: the need for maqasid based legislative strategies. Shariah Law Reports Articles, 2 ShLR 45.
M. Muhsin Khan. (2009). Sahih Al Bukhari (Trans.). Vol 3. Retrieved November 11, 2025, from https://d1.islamhouse.com/data/en/ih_books/single/en_Sahih_Al-Bukhari.pdf.
Nasiruddin al-Khattab. (2007). English Translation of Sunan Ibn Majah (Trans.). Vol 5. Darussalam Global Leader in Islamic Books: Riyadh.
Nasiruddin al-Khattab. (2008). Sunan Abu Dawud (Trans.). Vol 3. Darussalam Global Leader in Islamic Book: Riyadh.
National Land Code 1965 (Act 56). Law of Malaysia.
Onn, N. E., Khan, M. A., & Mokhtar, K. A. (2022). The Legal Perspectives Of The Doctrine Of Navigability Of Airspace For Commercial Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) In Shipping And Delivery. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 7 (29), 673-688. DOI: 10.35631/IJLGC.729045.
Onn, N. E. (2022). The Principle of Ad Coelom in Respect to The Low-Altitude Airspace for The Commercial Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Malaysia. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 7 (30), 110-123. DOI: 10.35631/IJLGC.730010.
Onn, N.E. (2024). The regulation of commercial use of unmanned aerial vehicles in Malaysia. [Doctoral dissertation, International Islamic University Malaysia]. International Islamic University Malaysia Repository. https://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/941.
Pill, S. C. (2018). Knowing shari'ah law: epistemology and indeterminacy in islamic jurisprudence. Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law, 18(2) 1-71.
Sait, S. & Peters, B. (2011). Islamic principles and land opportunities for engagement. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT). Retrieved November 11, 2025, from https://unhabitat.org/islamic-principles-and-land-opportunities-for-engagement.
Sheets, K. D. (2018). The Japanese impact on global drone policy and law: Why laggard United States and other nations should look to Japan in the context of drone usage. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 25(1), pp.513-538.
Siti Mariam Malinumbay S. Salasal. (1998). The concept of land ownership: Islamic perspective. Buletin Geoinformasi, 2(2), pp. 285-304.
Taofeeq Olamilekan Sanusi. (2025). Maqasid Al-Shariah as an Evaluative Framework for the Digitalisation of Islamic Education (Contemporary Hermeneutic Approach Study). Permata: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam. Volume 6 Number 1, pp. 49-63.
United States v. Causby. (1946). 328 U.S. 256.
Yamamah, A. (2016). The existence of al-urf (social tradition) in Islamic law theory. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 21(12), pp. 43-48
