REVISITING THE MORAL CORE OF INTEGRITY: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK LINKING MORAL REASONING AND HONESTY IN CONTEMPORARY ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.1145031Keywords:
Ethics, Honesty, Moral ReasoningAbstract
Despite extensive scholarship on ethical behaviour, the relationship between moral reasoning and honesty remains conceptually fragmented, with limited integration across cognitive-developmental and behavioral ethics perspectives. Existing research often treats honesty as a situational or dispositional outcome without sufficiently examining the underlying moral reasoning processes that shape truthful conduct. Drawing on the cognitive-developmental theory of moral reasoning (Kohlberg, 1984) and the neo-Kohlbergian framework (Rest et al., 1999), alongside contemporary behavioral ethics insights (Treviño et al., 2006; Aquino & Reed, 2002), this conceptual paper proposes an integrative framework positioning moral reasoning as a foundational driver of honesty. The central argument asserts that higher stages of moral reasoning not only enhance ethical judgment but also strengthen internalized moral identity, thereby increasing the likelihood of honest behaviour across contexts. The paper advances a conceptual model that connects moral reasoning, moral identity, and situational moderators (e.g., organizational climate, social norms) to explain variations in honesty. This framework addresses a critical gap by synthesizing traditionally silo-ed theories into a cohesive explanatory structure. The contribution lies in re-conceptualizing honesty as a function of both cognitive moral development and identity-based motivation, offering a more nuanced understanding of ethical conduct. The paper holds significant implications for ethics education, organizational governance, and integrity-based leadership by emphasizing the cultivation of moral reasoning capacities as a pathway to fostering sustainable honesty in complex environments.
Downloads
References
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. (2022). Ethical leadership research: Current state and future directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.
Carlson, R. W., Bigman, Y. E., Gray, K., Ferguson, M. J., & Crockett, M. J. (2022). How inferred motives shape moral judgment. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(8), 468–478.
Dong, Y., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2022). Recent advances in assessing moral reasoning using the Defining Issues Test.
Greene, J. D. (2023). Dual-process moral judgment beyond fast and slow. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22003193
Hertwig, R., & Mazar, N. (2022). Toward a taxonomy and review of honesty interventions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101410.
Hertz, S. G., Krettenauer, T., & Schmitt, M. (2023). Moral identity and moral behavior: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Jennings, P. L., Mitchell, M. S., & Hannah, S. T. (2023). Recent review on moral self and ethical leadership.
Kaptein, M. (2022). The effectiveness of business ethics programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics.
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2024). Behavioral ethics in organizations: Current advances and future directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development, Vol. 2: The psychology of moral development. Harper & Row.
Psychological Science, 23(10), 1264–1270.
Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Shalvi, S., Eldar, O., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications)
Russo, C., Zagrean, I., Cavagnis, L., Cristalli, S., Valtulini, V., Danioni, F., & Barni, D. (2025). The Relationship Between Kindness and Transgressive Behaviors in Adolescence: The Moderating Role of Self-Importance of Moral Identity. Adolescents, 5(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents5030040
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306235
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioural ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990. doi:10.1177/0149206306294258
Xu, X., Li, M., Kwan, H. K., & Zhang, X. (2024). The antecedents of moral identity: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(3), 1697–1728.
Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2023). The relation between honesty-humility and moral concerns as expressed in language. Journal of Research in Personality, 103, 104351. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104351
Zickfeld, J. H., Karg, S. T. S., Engen, S. S., et al. (2024). Committed (dis)honesty: A systematic meta-analytic review of the divergent effects of social commitment to individuals or honesty oaths on dishonest behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 150(5), 586–620.
