FROM E-WASTE REGULATION TO CLIMATE ACTION: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF LEGAL EFFECTIVENESS, REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, AND CLIMATE GOVERNANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.1145041Keywords:
Climate Governance, E-Waste, Environmental Legal Framework Effectiveness, Regulatory Compliance, Responsive Regulation TheoryAbstract
Electronic waste (e-waste) continues to grow in volume, raising concerns for environmental protection and climate change mitigation. Legal and regulatory measures govern its collection, recycling, treatment, disposal, transboundary movement and producer responsibility. Yet their existence does not necessarily ensure effective implementation, regulatory compliance or alignment with climate objectives. While the literature addresses these issues, it pays far less attention to how environmental legal framework effectiveness, regulatory compliance, and climate governance might work together. This paper examines that relationship and considers regulatory compliance as a potential mediating mechanism between environmental legal framework effectiveness and climate governance. To develop the framework, relevant multidisciplinary studies were identified through Scopus and reviewed using a narrative approach, followed by integrative thematic analysis. Four broad dimensions emerged from the literature: legal effectiveness, implementation and compliance, governance capacity, and the integration of e-waste regulation with climate and circular economy objectives. Drawing on Responsive Regulation Theory, the framework proposes that effective legal and institutional arrangements may encourage compliance, reflected in responsible e-waste practices that may, in turn, contribute to climate-responsive governance. It also recognises a potential direct relationship between environmental legal framework effectiveness and climate governance. Theoretically, the framework brings the three constructs into a single explanatory model and extends Responsive Regulation Theory to the broader climate-governance implications of compliant e-waste practices. Practically, it highlights the importance of effective implementation, monitoring, institutional coordination, stakeholder accountability, and climate-responsive regulatory design. As these relationships remain theoretical, the framework provides a basis for future empirical research into whether, and under what conditions, effective e-waste regulation and sustained compliance contribute to broader climate governance objectives.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A. (2026). Civil liability for e-waste. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 631, 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04378-8_60
Arya, S., & Kumar, S. (2020). E-waste in India at a glance: Current trends, regulations, challenges and management strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122707
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195070705.001.0001
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
Boateng, D., Breen, M., Marks, D., & O’Neill, N. (2026). Electronic waste in the European Union: A systematic review and a pathway for sustainable management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances, 31, 200365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2026.200365
Braithwaite, J. (2011). The essence of responsive regulation. University of British Columbia Law Review, 44(3), 475–520.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Castellón, A., Osorto, S., & Perdomo, M. E. (2025). Global e-waste legislation: Policies and progress. E3S Web of Conferences, 629, 03004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562903004
Godbole, N. (2011). E-waste management: Challenges and issues. In Green technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (Vol. 3, pp. 1637–1662). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-472-1.ch707
Goodall, M. (2019). Regulation of electronic waste under the Basel Convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 36(4), 322–338.
Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
Karthikeyan, S., Bundhe, S., Naveen, K. S., Gottumukkala, P., Joshi, A., Sridhar, D., & Bhoopathy, V. (2026). Blockchain and digital solutions for e-waste management. In Harnessing smart recycling for sustainable e-waste management (pp. 147–170). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4407-2.ch005
Kiddee, P., Naidu, R., & Wong, M. H. (2013). Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Management, 33(5), 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.006
Kumar, A., Holuszko, M., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2017). E-waste: An overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.018
Li, J., Zeng, X., Chen, M., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Stevels, A. (2015). “Control-Alt-Delete”: Rebooting solutions for the e-waste problem. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(12), 7095–7108. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00449
Mdoe, C. N., Bakari, T. S., & Ngowi, E. E. (2026). E-waste and climate change: A global bibliometric analysis of research trends and policy integration. Environment Systems and Decisions, 46(3), Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-026-10103-z
O’Neill, K. (2019). Linking wastes and climate change: Bandwagoning, contention, and global governance. WIREs Climate Change, 10(2), e568. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.568
Parajuly, K., Fitzpatrick, C., Muldoon, O., & Kuehr, R. (2020). Behavioral change for the circular economy: A review with focus on electronic waste management in the EU. Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X, 6, 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100035
Patil, R. A., & Ramakrishna, S. (2020). A comprehensive analysis of e-waste legislation worldwide. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 14412–14431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07992-1
Sasso, L. (2023). The EU e-waste policy and regulation. In Development in e-waste management: Sustainability and circular economy aspects (pp. 19–40). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003301899-3
Shaker, A. H. M., Pathak, P., & Verma, A. (2026). Climate-responsive e-waste management through strengthening extended producer responsibility: A legal and policy framework. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 46(2), 156–164.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Usha Amulya, N. V. N. S. S., Ghosh, A., & Parihar, S. S. (2026). Wired to sustainable revolution: Navigating e-waste in Asia. In Harnessing smart recycling for sustainable e-waste management (pp. 259–293). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4407-2.ch009
Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., & Böni, H. (2005). Global perspectives on e-waste. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.00155
