INTEGRATING SHARIAH PRINCIPLES IN EDUCATIONAL GOVERNANCE: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF ISLAMIC SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.1145044Keywords:
Educational Governance, Islamic Schools, Maqasid Al-Shariah, Shariah Governance, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Embedding Shariah principles in the governance of Islamic schools presents significant challenges. Schools must remain faithful to classical Islamic jurisprudence while also meeting internationally recognised academic standards and reconciling these two commitments creates considerable tension in day-to-day practice. Although prior research has addressed aspects of this issue, existing studies remain fragmented across different disciplines and institutional contexts, offering little consolidated evidence. This review therefore examines these challenges by asking how Shariah principles are applied in educational governance and by identifying the barriers to their implementation. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (Page et al., 2021), 13 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus and Web of Science were retained after screening, quality appraisal and thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The synthesis produced three themes: the integration of Shariah in policy and curriculum; quality assurance and ethical leadership; and institutional tensions and regulatory challenges. Across the studies, the higher objectives of Islamic law (Maqasid al-Shariah) consistently enabled schools to adapt modern policies while preserving their religious character. The studies also identified recurring obstacles, including seniority-based leadership hierarchies that slow reform, limited digital infrastructure, and unresolved jurisdictional gaps between classical doctrine and contemporary statute, which together indicate a need for specialised, independent Shariah supervisory oversight. This review contributes a consolidated, evidence-based synthesis of fragmented multidisciplinary literature and provides policymakers with a defensible basis for developing context-sensitive governance frameworks for faith-based institutions.
Downloads
References
Arar, K., Cansoy, R., Türkoğlu, M. E., & Utku, R. (2026). Islamic educational leadership: A systematic review of empirical evidence and a conceptual framework. Journal of Educational Administration and History. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2026.2671907
Basir, M. Z. K., Sham, F. M., Pao, N. A. M. T. A. T. A., & Ismail, I. (2026). Conceptual framework: Mualaf, ta'lif, Muslim converts, Sarawak. International Journal of Islamic Thought. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.29.2026.360
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Candraningrum, D., Hidayat, N., & Wulandari, F. D. (2026). Colonial echoes, national aspirations: English language teaching in postcolonial Muhammadiyah contexts. Current Issues in Language Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2026.2653844
Dzar, M. A., Zaim, M. A., & Amanullah, M. (2026). Conceptualizing siyasah in the four Sunni schools: Classical juristic debates and the juristic logic of political flexibility. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v11i1.16245
Ezzani, M. D., Brooks, M. C., Yang, L., & Bloom, A. (2023). Islamic school leadership and social justice: An international review of the literature. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(5), 745–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2009037
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
Mukhlis, M., Iqbal, M., Safitri, M., & Hasniyati, H. (2025). Challenges in implementing Sharia-based education: Balancing regional autonomy and children's rights in Aceh. Khazanah Hukum, 7(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i1.41012
Niza, N. M., Latif, R. A., & Sahdan, M. H. (2026). Corporate strategic innovation, board diversity, and the moderating role of board independence: Evidence from an emerging Islamic economy. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2025-0318
Noval, M., & Ardianto, A. (2026). CSR expenditure and Islamic bank performance: The moderating role of Sharia supervisory board characteristics. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2025-0199
Omar, M. N., & Badar, M. I. M. A. (2026). An Islamic juristic framework for data and algorithmic monetisation in the digital economy. International Journal of Islamic Finance and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.55188/ijifsd.v18i2.1255
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
Rafiq, S., Afzal, A., & ul-Ain, Q. (2026). Bridging the divide: Exploring policy gaps and cultural barriers to comprehensive sexuality education in Muslim-majority countries. Sexuality & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-025-10448-8
Razak, A. A., Bin Jamil, A. I., & Jamalludin, N. H. (2026). Darul Quran MAIK's transition to higher education: A qualitative analysis of institutional challenges. Journal of Sakarya University Faculty of Theology. https://doi.org/10.17335/sakaifd.1784903
Saekan, M., & Kayadibi, S. (2026). Institutionalizing quality culture in non-formal Islamic education: Evidence from Qiroati-based Qur'anic schools in Indonesia. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v7i2.2958
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sulaiman, S., Yusnaini, S., & Widyanto, A. (2023). Development of Islamic Sharia-based curriculum in Islamic universities in Aceh: A study on the implementation of Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2015. Ulumuna, 27(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.521 [see note below — year/source needs your confirmation]
Supani, Asmaya, E., Saiin, A., Yusuf, M., & Kurniawan, C. S. (2026). Between legal formalism and welfare orientation: Maqasid-based analysis of waqf land exchange practices in Banyumas. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v11i1.13941
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Wahab, N. A. A., Muda, M. Z., & Said, N. L. M. (2026). Baitulmal: Its role as an heir according to fuqaha' and legal practices in Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2026.44.1.5
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yuspiani, Y., Muhsin, M., Mahfudz, M., Shuhufi, M., & Muhammad, F. (2026). MUI fatwas and Sharia-based policy governance in Islamic education management in Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v10.i1.28762
