CHARTING RESEARCH TRENDS ON UNIVERSITY AWARENESS AND VOLUNTEERISM: A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.830038Keywords:
Inclusive Education, Disability Awareness, University Volunteerism, Higher Education, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
This study maps the global research landscape on university awareness and volunteerism in relation to disability-inclusive higher education for persons with disabilities (PWD). Although previous studies have examined disability awareness, inclusive education and volunteer engagement separately, limited bibliometric evidence has systematically integrated these three areas within a single analytical framework. Existing scholarship also remains geographically uneven, with limited visibility of research from Global South and ASEAN higher education contexts. To address these gaps, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed journal articles published between 2019 and 2024. The analysis employed VOSviewer version 1.6.20 to examine publication trends, country-level co-authorship networks, citation patterns and keyword co-occurrence structures. The findings show that research on PWD awareness and volunteerism in higher education is largely concentrated in high-income Western countries, particularly the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia, while contributions from ASEAN and other Global South regions remain comparatively limited. The results further suggest that post-COVID-19 scholarship has increasingly shifted toward psychosocial support, empowerment and inclusive institutional responsibility. This study contributes theoretically by clarifying the intellectual structure of research linking university awareness, volunteerism and disability-inclusive education. Practically, it provides evidence-based insights for universities, policymakers and disability support practitioners to strengthen inclusive volunteer programmes, institutional awareness strategies and culturally responsive support systems for PWD in higher education.
Downloads
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric database. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Bakri, Z. A. B., Mahmood, W. S. B. W., & Zakaria, M. A. B. (2019). Kajian kes: Impak sukarelawan Yes! Politeknik Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin dalam melakukan kerja-kerja kesukarelawanan TVET. Journal on Technical and Vocational Education, 4(3), 92–98. mohe.gov.my
Clouder, L., Karakus, M., Cinotti, A., Ferreyra, M. V., Fierros, G. A., & Rojo, P. (2020). Neurodiversity in higher education: A narrative synthesis. Higher Education, 80, 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401
Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745880
Hamzah, I. S., Zin, S. A. M., Jamal, M. B., Sarifin, M. R., & Kamarudin, L. A. (2022). The role of voluntary activity in nurturing student’s soft skills. Perspektif Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 14, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.37134/perspektif.vol14.sp.6.2022
Kruithof, K., Suurmond, J., Kal, D., & Harting, J. (2021). Volunteer work with vulnerable persons in the community: A qualitative study of social inclusion. Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 696–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320913142
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Donthu, N. (2022). Bibliometric analysis: The state of the art and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1170–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.049
Lindsay, S., et al. (2019). A systematic review of factors affecting attitudes toward people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(15), 1785–1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1432708
Lombardi, A. R., Murray, C., & Dallas, B. (2018). University faculty attitudes toward disability and inclusive instruction. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 31(4), 363–381.
Moriña, A. (2020). Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1581401
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Rosli, H. F., Sabri, S. A., & Takril, N. (2022). Peranan kakitangan akademik dalam mewujudkan kesedaran terhadap keperluan OKU di IPT. Journal of Quran Sunnah Education & Special Needs, 6(1), 1–13.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2022). VOSviewer manual and recent developments in bibliometric mapping. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation
