AI IN LEARNING: EFFECTS ON UNDERGRADUATE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.831044

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI-Assisted Learning, Critical Thinking Skills, Higher Education, Undergraduate Students

Abstract

The growing presence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in university learning has changed how students search for information, organise ideas, and approach academic tasks. However, the relationship between AI engagement and students’ critical thinking skills remains an important issue for investigation. This study examines the relationships between AI Usage, Learning Attitude toward AI, academic performance (CGPA), and Critical Thinking Skill among engineering undergraduates. A quantitative survey was conducted involving 160 students, and the collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression. The findings indicate significant positive relationships between AI Usage, Learning Attitude toward AI, CGPA, and Critical Thinking Skill. The regression model was statistically significant and explained 82.6% of the variance in Critical Thinking Skill. Among the predictors, CGPA recorded the largest standardized regression coefficient, followed by AI Usage and Learning Attitude toward AI. However, the regression coefficients should be interpreted cautiously due to the strong association between AI Usage and Learning Attitude. The findings suggest that critical thinking in AI-assisted learning environments is related to multiple factors, including students’ academic background, engagement with AI tools, and attitudes toward technology. This study provides insights for educators and higher education institutions in developing responsible AI integration approaches that encourage students to evaluate and engage critically with AI-generated information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484

Binjwair, A. A. (2025). Predicting STEM students' adoption of generative AI in academic contexts: An application of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1669750. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1669750

Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Cormier, D., & Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures of artificial intelligence and generative AI in the education landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 1–30. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/709

Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceiving and endorsing Artificial Intelligence: Learning behavioral patterns of primary school students in AI education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–17.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Faisal, A. (2024). Verification behaviors and metacognitive awareness among university students using generative AI engines. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 882–897.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409137

Hassen, M. (2025). The impact of AI on students' reading, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. American Journal of Education and Information Technology, 9(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajeit.20250902.12

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning: Implications for higher education. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Phan, H. P. (2010). Critical thinking as a self-regulatory process component in teaching and learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(1), 283–310.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.

Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

20-09-2026

How to Cite

Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., Mohamed, S. A., Omar, M., & Hamat, M. (2026). AI IN LEARNING: EFFECTS ON UNDERGRADUATE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN EDUCATION (IJMOE), 8(31), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.831044