TECHNO-SPIRITUAL INTERACTION: LEVERAGING RAY CASTING IN AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) TO FOSTER AMANAH AND AWE IN AVIAN CONSERVATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.1144054

Keywords:

Amanah, Augmented Reality, Awe, Islamic Environmental Ethics, Moral Agency, Ray Casting, System Usability Scale

Abstract

Current research on Augmented Reality (AR) consistently demonstrates its effectiveness in raising environmental awareness. Yet a persistent values behaviour gap limits the extent to which technical interaction translates into deeply rooted ethical stewardship. This paper proposes a Techno-Spiritual Interaction approach that integrates ray-casting interaction with Islamic environmental ethics to strengthen human character and moral responsibility. A mobile AR application, Burung Hijrah, was developed in which users rescue oiled migratory birds, specifically the Whimbrel and the Black Baza, situated at Tanjung Piai National Park, a Ramsar site at the southernmost point of mainland Asia. Through the precision of ray casting mechanics, users are actively and cognitively engaged in performing the act of rescue, which is immediately reinforced by Wonders of Creation content highlighting the biological engineering and migratory feats of the birds. An exploratory single-group post-use evaluation involved 30 participants, most of whom were undergraduate Information Technology students. The study employed the System Usability Scale (SUS) alongside a techno-spiritual instrument that measured Awe, Amanah, and Moral Agency. The application achieved a SUS score of 73.5, indicating good usability. Users reported very high levels of Awe (M=4.45) and Amanah (M=4.43), and high Moral Agency (M=4.08), with 90% agreeing that the digital rescue act felt morally meaningful despite being a simulation. Most participants also expressed an intention to build morally oriented applications in the future. The findings suggest that combining precise AR interaction with spiritual reflection offers a promising design approach for supporting users' reported experiences of Awe, Amanah, and Moral Agency, particularly among future IT practitioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd Majid, N. A., & Abd Majid, N. (2018). Augmented reality to promote guided discovery learning for STEM learning. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(4-2), 1494–1500.

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322

Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

Basri, S., Adnan, Y., Widiastuty, L., Syamsul, M. A., & Indar, I. (2025). Islamic environmental ethics: A cultural framework for sustainable resource management and global ecological stewardship. Diversity: Disease Preventive of Research Integrity, 5(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.24252/diversity.v5i2.52342

Bowman, D. A., & Hodges, L. F. (1997). An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/253284.253301

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9

Chirico, A., Cipresso, P., Yaden, D. B., Biassoni, F., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. (2017). Effectiveness of immersive videos in inducing awe: An experimental study. Scientific Reports, 7, 1218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01242-0

Ferdinan, Abdillah, Abd Rahman, & Abd Rahman Bahtiar. (2026). Eco Islamic education and its contribution to sustainable development goals in Muhammadiyah boarding schools of South Sulawesi. Discover Sustainability, 7, 310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02647-6

Foltz, R. C., Denny, F. M., & Baharuddin, A. (Eds.). (2003). Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust. Harvard University Press.

Griffin, T. A., Green, B. P., & Welie, J. V. M. (2024). The ethical agency of AI developers. AI and Ethics, 4, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00256-3

Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002

Jeong, J.-W., & Jeong, J.-Y. (2024). Effect of onset position of ray casting in virtual reality. In CHI Extended Abstracts 2024. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650905

Kahn, A. S., & Cargile, A. C. (2021). Immersive and interactive awe: Evoking awe via presence in virtual reality and online videos to prompt prosocial behavior. Human Communication Research, 47(4), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab007

Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297

Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2009). The factor structure of the System Usability Scale. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human Centered Design (HCD 2009), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5619, pp. 94–103). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12

Nikou, S. A. (2026). Motivation as a driver of engagement in augmented-reality learning in primary schools. TechTrends, 70, 398–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01157-y

Nóbrega, R., Jacob, J., Coelho, A., Ribeiro, J., Weber, J., & Ferreira, S. (2018). Leveraging pervasive games for tourism: An augmented reality perspective. International Journal of Creative Interfaces and Computer Graphics, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCICG.2018010101

Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018

Pimentel, D. (2022). Saving species in a snap: On the feasibility and efficacy of augmented reality-based wildlife interactions for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 65, 126151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126151

Prasetya, F., Fortuna, A., Samala, A. D., Rawas, S., Mystakidis, S., et al. (2024). The impact of augmented reality learning experiences based on the motivational design model: A meta-analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 100926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100926

Rakhmat, A. (2022). Islamic ecotheology: Understanding the concept of Khalifah and the ethical responsibility of the environment. Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22515/ajipp.v3i1.5104

Ramsar Sites Information Service. (2003). Tanjung Piai, Malaysia (Ramsar Site no. 1288). https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1288

Reh, B., Díaz, S., & Martínez-Valverde, R. (2025). AR you aware? Augmented reality in zoos to highlight the trashy truth of human waste impacts. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 13(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.19227/jzar.v13i1.821

Santos, L. A. da R., Coelho, A., & Nóbrega, R. (2019). Game design for environmental awareness – the case of “Invasive Plants” [Conference paper]. Videojogos 2018: 10th International Conference on Videogame Sciences and Arts, Portugal.

Santos, L., Silva, N., Nóbrega, R., Almeida, R., & Coelho, A. (2020). An interactive application framework for natural parks using serious location-based games with augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP 2020) – Volume 1: GRAPP (pp. 247–254). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008947602470254

Van Cappellen, P., & Saroglou, V. (2012). Awe activates religious and spiritual feelings and behavioral intentions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(3), 223.

Wani, N. H., & Azhar, A. (2024). Islamic environmental ethics: Preserving the sacred balance. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(3).

Wu, L., et al. (2025). Awe and adolescents' pro-environmental behavior: The role of nature connectedness and moral identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 103, 102465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102465

Zuhdi, A., Bilhaq, M. A. M., & Putri, R. L. (2024). Islamic philosophy's approach to environmental ethics: An analysis of the teachings of the Qur'an and Hadith. Journal of Noesantara Islamic Studies, 1(4), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijnis.v1i4.1392

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Majid, N. A. A., Lam , M. C., Tan , S. Y., Abidin, R. Z., Suwadi, N. A., & Hashim, N. C. (2026). TECHNO-SPIRITUAL INTERACTION: LEVERAGING RAY CASTING IN AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) TO FOSTER AMANAH AND AWE IN AVIAN CONSERVATION. JOURNAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT (JISTM), 11(44), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.1144054