BOARD DIVERSITY AND SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURE QUALITY: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK INTEGRATING RESOURCE DEPENDENCE THEORY AND STAKEHOLDER THEORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.829037Keywords:
Board Diversity, Sustainability Disclosure Quality, ESG Committee Effectiveness, Resource Dependence Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Corporate GovernanceAbstract
Sustainability disclosure is now an important feature of company reporting as the focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues grows. However, the evidence regarding board diversity remains mixed. Some studies link a diverse board to improved sustainability reporting, while others find little to no effect. This research contends that the distinction may lay in what happens after diverse directors are selected. Specifically, the board must create an internal framework that allows for the exploitation of varied information and perspectives in ESG supervision. Drawing on Stakeholder Theory and Resource Dependence Theory (RDT), this paper develops a framework in which ESG committee effectiveness strengthens the relationship between board diversity and sustainability disclosure quality. ESG committee effectiveness is considered in terms of independence, relevant expertise, and diligence. The framework distinguishes between the resources that diverse directors contribute and the committee structure that is used to apply those resources. Three propositions are developed for future empirical testing. The paper contributes to the governance literature by showing that board composition and committee effectiveness should be considered together, especially in emerging markets where formal diversity requirements may not always result in meaningful participation.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, S. N., Aziz, A., & Azani, A. (2022). The effect of board independence, gender diversity and board size on firm performance in Malaysia. Journal of Social Economics Research, 9(4), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.18488/35.v9i4.3226
Arayssi, M., Dah, M., & Jizi, M. (2016). Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 376–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2015-0055
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.
Bojan, A. M., & Lungu, C. I. (2025). Does corporate governance drive the narrative tone of sustainability reporting? Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecmlg.21.1.4242
Chow, K. Y., Alfan, E., & Mustapha, M. Z. (2024). Sustainability committee and environmental, social and governance (ESG): A systematic literature review. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(1), 484–508. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.7603.2024
Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471391
EmadEldeen, R., Elbayuomi, A. F., Elmoursy, H., Bouaddi, M., & Basuony, M. A. (2025). Does board diversity drive sustainability? Evidence from UK-listed companies. Sustainability, 17(3), 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031177
Endrikat, J., de Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. (2021). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic investigation. Business & Society, 60(8), 2099–2135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320930638
Fernandez, C., Evandio, D. Y., & Riantono, I. E. (2025). Corporate governance and ESG strategies: The moderating impact of internal audit quality on financial performance in Indonesian companies. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.6983
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Hao, J., & Rezaee, Z. (2025). The impact of mandatory ESG disclosure on firms' graph disclosure quality: Evidence from the European Union Directive. The International Journal of Accounting. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406025410033
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179
Kivits, R., & Sawang, S. (2021). Stakeholder theory. Contributions to Management Science, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_1
Lu, J., Yu, D., Mahmoudian, F., Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2024). The influence of board interlocks and sustainability experience on transparent sustainability disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 3769–3793. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3678
Mahmood, Z., Kouser, R., Ali, W., Ahmad, Z., & Salman, T. (2018). Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed methods study. Sustainability, 10(1), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010207
Mshana, A. A., Mzenzi, S. I., & Suluo, S. J. (2025). Enhancing integrated reporting quality through boardroom diversity: The critical role of board diligence in the petroleum industry. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2454317. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2454317
Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2014a). Does the corporate governance characteristics of corporate social responsibility committees affect environmental or social performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8
Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2014b). Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? Evidence from greenhouse gas emission accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 637–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1886-9
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309350722
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors' composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309350722
Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
Velte, P. (2016). Women on management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2015-0027
Xu, B., Jamal, N. M., Liu, Y., & Yahya, T. B. (2025). Board diversity and environmental disclosure: A review, current insights, and emerging trends. Sustainability, 17(3), 12https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031211
