ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) PERFORMANCE, BIG FOUR AUDITORS AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.829039

Keywords:

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG), Corporate Financial Performance, Return on Assets, Auditor Quality, Fixed Effects, Malaysia

Abstract

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices have become increasingly important in promoting corporate sustainability and responsible business conduct as investors, regulators, and other stakeholders place greater emphasis on non-financial performance. Although ESG initiatives are expected to enhance corporate reputation, stakeholder confidence, and long-term competitiveness, empirical evidence regarding their influence on corporate financial performance remains inconclusive, particularly in emerging markets. This study examines the association between ESG performance and corporate financial performance and whether auditor type moderates this relationship among Malaysian listed companies. A balanced panel of 34 non-financial firms from 2015 to 2024 (340 firm-year observations) was analysed. The Hausman test supported the Fixed Effects specification, and the primary inference uses firm-clustered robust standard errors. Return on Assets (ROA) is used as the financial performance measure, while auditor type (Big Four versus non-Big Four) is used as a proxy for auditor quality. In the cluster-robust Fixed Effects model, ESG is positively but not significantly associated with ROA (β = 0.00134, t = 1.52, p = 0.138), and the ESG × Auditor interaction is also statistically insignificant (β = -0.00028, t = -0.62, p = 0.537). Leverage is significantly and negatively associated with ROA (β = -0.131, t = -2.18, p = 0.037). These results indicate that the positive ESG-ROA association observed in the conventional Fixed Effects estimation is not robust to firm-clustered inference and that Big Four status does not strengthen the ESG-ROA relationship. The study contributes recent Malaysian evidence by showing that short-run accounting profitability is more closely associated with capital structure than with ESG scores, while cautioning against interpreting ESG performance as a direct driver of immediate profitability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bani-Khaled, S., Azevedo, G., & Oliveira, J. (2025). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence. AMS review, 15(1), 228-260.

Blowfield, M., Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2014). Corporate responsibility. Oxford University Press, USA.

Chang, X., Fu, K., Jin, Y., & Liem, P. F. (2022). Sustainable finance: ESG/CSR, firm value, and investment returns. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 51(3), 325-371.

Dathe, T., Helmold, M., Dathe, R., & Dathe, I. (2024). ESG reporting rules. In Implementing Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Principles for Sustainable Businesses: A Practical Guide in Sustainability Management (pp. 147-158). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Diab, A., & Eissa, M. (2024). ESG performance, auditor choice, and audit opinion: Evidence from Egyptian listed firms. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.

Farag, M. I. H. (2026). Sustainability-driven business excellence: Integrating ESG principles for long-term competitiveness. In Developing an architecture of future-ready business excellence (pp. 215-260). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

Hammami, A., & Hendijani Zadeh, M. (2020). Audit quality, media coverage, environmental, social, and governance disclosure and firm investment efficiency: Evidence from Canada. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(1), 45-72.

Han, N. D. T., & Ha, N. T. (2024). ESG and corporate financial performance: The moderating role of audit quality in emerging markets. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 13068-13088. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00935

Handayati, P., Tham, Y. H., Yuningsih, Y., Sun, Z., Nugroho, T. R., & Rochayatun, S. (2025). ESG performance and corporate governance-The moderating role of the Big Four auditors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010031

Helmi, H., Wibowo, A. S., Yuniati, A., Octaviani, T., & Imanuel, F. N. (2025). Evidence of the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, audit quality, earnings quality, and abnormal return in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(2), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v17i2.13317

Hussin, S. N. A., Nik Wan, N. Z., Abd Aziz, A. A., Zakaria, R. A., & Che Hassan, N. A. (2025). Determinants of environment, social and governance (ESG) disclosure among publicly listed companies in Malaysia: A conceptual review. Advanced International Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, 7(24), 116-130.

Karabiyik, H., Palm, F. C., & Urbain, J.-P. (2019). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data Models with Multifactor Error Structures. Annual Review of Economics, 11, 495-522. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26773902

Krasodomska, J., & Eisenschmidt, K. (2025). “G” and ESG Strategy Integration and Disclosure: Exploring the Governance‐Related Factors That Influence Companies' Decision‐Making. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2681-2696.

Sahabuddin, A. S., & Che-Yahya, N. (2026). Does ESG drive ROA and ROI recovery in distressed Malaysian companies? Advanced International Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, 8(27), 547-562.

Seow, R. (2025). Enhancing corporate transparency: The impact of auditor quality and audit committee dynamics on ESG disclosure. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 18(1), 69-100. https://doi.org/10.22452/AJAP.vol18no1.3

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355−374.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.

Yip, Y. (2025). Investigating the Relationship Between ESG Disclosure Performance and Audit Fees in the Presence of Institutional Ownership: Evidence from Malaysian Listed Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(12), 688.

Yusof, A. F. M., & Widyasamratri, H. (2025). Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Review of Frameworks, Metrics, and Reporting for Sustainable Development. Civil and Sustainable Urban Engineering, 5(2), 102-116.

Zaim, N. I. N. M., Lode, N. A., & Ismail, W. A. W. (2025). Societal Wellbeing Disclosure, Corporate Governance, and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(6), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.14419/wtfn7b90

Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 127.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15

How to Cite

Halid, S., Rosli, S. A., Zaini, N., Maruhun, E. N. S., Rahman, R. A., & Ibrahim, M. (2026). ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) PERFORMANCE, BIG FOUR AUDITORS AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIA. ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SME’S (AIJBES), 8(29), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.829039