THE EFFECT OF RESISTANCE BAND EXERCISE ON ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING AND FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE AMONG OLDER ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1162009Keywords:
Activities Of Daily Living, Functional Independence, Older Adult, Resistance BandAbstract
This systematic literature review (SLR) investigates the impact of resistance band exercises on improving physical strength, mobility, and functional independence in older adults. The growing need for effective interventions to promote the health of aging populations has led to the increasing popularity of resistance band exercises due to their low cost, accessibility, and adaptability for individuals with varying physical capabilities. The review synthesizes studies examining the physical and psychosocial benefits of these exercises, particularly for older adults aged 60 and above. It explores the effectiveness of resistance band exercises in improving activities of daily living (ADLs), mobility, balance, and strength, as well as their positive impact on mental health and social engagement. Findings suggest that resistance band exercises offer comparable, if not superior, benefits to more traditional forms of resistance training, such as free weights, especially for individuals with mobility limitations. Additionally, these exercises contribute to improved mood, reduced anxiety, and increased social interaction, which are essential for enhancing overall well-being and combating isolation. Despite the promising results, the review identifies several gaps in the literature, including the need for long-term studies, subgroup-specific research, and further exploration of the physiological mechanisms behind the observed benefits. The review concludes that resistance band exercises are a practical and effective intervention for improving both the physical and psychosocial health of older adults, with significant implications for health practitioners and policymakers.
Downloads
References
Anggoro, K. J. (2020). Pear Deck. RELC Journal, 52(3), 645-647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220936735
Anggoro, K. J., & Pratiwi, D. I. (2021). Students’ perceptions of interactive slides in online flipped classrooms. Journal of Education and Learning, 15(2), 123–132.
Cavite, F. A. M., & Marcial, D. E. (2022). Correlates of learning satisfaction and learning engagement in online distance education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 90(4), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v90i4.4920
Farid, B., Zafar, M., Rasheed, K., & Arshad, H. (2024). Challenges faced by nursing students in online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024(1), Article 755. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.755
Ghasemi, M. R., Moonaghi, H. K., & Heydari, A. (2020). Strategies for sustaining and enhancing nursing students’ engagement in academic and clinical settings: A narrative review. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 32(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2020.159
Grise, J. B. (2025). Active learning strategies and student engagement in online higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00456-7
Haryani, F., & Ayuningtyas, N. (2021). The impact of interactive online learning by Pear Deck on students’ learning engagement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1957(1), 012032.
Hashim, Z., & Aziz, A. A. (2022). Use of Pear Deck as an interactive tool in teaching reading comprehension during the new normal. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.12(3), 1570–1583
Huang, H.-Y. C., Tseng, C. J., Lo, M.-F., Chen, S.-C., & Shih, Y.-C. (2022). Examining the effectiveness of student response systems on EFL reading comprehension and engagement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1045–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1846561
Huang, H.-Y. C., Tseng, C. J., Lo, M.-F., & Chen, Y.-C. (2022). Investigating technique efficacy in EFL reading instruction using Pear Deck. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7873–7894.
Idrissi, M. K., Bennani, S., & Benatiya, N. (2022). Digital technologies and student engagement in online learning environments: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5127–5154.
Jalaluddin, M. A., & Othman, N. (2021). Online learning engagement among university students during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(8), 124–137.
Kramer, S. N. (2021). Instructors’ perceptions of the opportunities and challenges of integrating technology in crisis-prompted online language instruction during COVID-19. https://www.proquest.com/openview/b28f1cbe71ab8295fb8d3f89e17ef71e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Mardhiyah, A., Yosep, I., Mediani, H. S., Rakhmawati, W., & Hendrawati, S. (2024). Overview of persistence during online learning on nursing students. Journal of Nursing and Care Technology, 1(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.70049/jnctech.v1i1.6
Maziidah, Z., & Qohar, A. (2025). Development of Pear Deck-assisted interactive teaching material to support mathematical reasoning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3372(1), 030012.
Miao, H., Guo, R., & Li, M. (2025). The influence of research self-efficacy and learning engagement on Ed. D students’ academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1562354.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Putri, R. S., & Suyatno, S. (2022). Student engagement in online learning using interactive digital platforms. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(2), 211–219.
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112.
Wang, J., & Chia, I. (2022). Engaging students via Nearpod® in synchronous online teaching. Management Teaching Review. 7(3), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298120974959
