ESL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF AI-POWERED WRITING ASSISTANTS IN LANGUAGE LEARNING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1162074

Keywords:

AI-Powered Writing Assistants, Artificial Intelligence, ESL Teachers, Perceived Benefits, Perceived Challenges, Primary Education

Abstract

This study investigates Malaysian primary school English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers’ perceptions of AI-powered writing assistants, with a focus on the perceived benefits and challenges of using tools such as Grammarly, QuillBot, and ChatGPT. Writing remains a challenging skill for primary pupils, and teachers often face constraints in providing individualized feedback due to large class sizes and varied proficiency levels. AI-powered writing assistants have the potential to address these challenges by providing immediate, personalized feedback and supporting learner autonomy. A quantitative descriptive survey was administered to 100 ESL teachers across five Malaysian states, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages. The findings reveal that teachers recognize multiple benefits of AI integration, including enhanced student engagement, improved revision habits, personalized support for weaker pupils, vocabulary development, and promotion of learner independence. However, teachers also identified challenges, such as ethical concerns, overreliance by pupils on AI suggestions, occasional inaccuracies in feedback, insufficient training, and limited digital infrastructure in certain schools. The study highlights the need for targeted professional development, clear ethical guidelines, and equitable access to technology to facilitate responsible and effective AI integration in primary ESL classrooms. By focusing on teachers’ perspectives, this research contributes empirical evidence from a Malaysian primary school context, offering practical and theoretical insights for policymakers, educators, and curriculum planners seeking to enhance writing instruction through AI tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aineh, M. A., & Ngui, W. (2024). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards the use of ChatGPT to improve writing in the Malaysian secondary school context. International Journal of e-Learning Practices, 7(1), 1–8.

Basaruddin, M. A., & Mustafa, H. R. (2025). Empowering AI for English materials analysis in primary special education: Teachers’ perceptions and usability factors. Journal of Special Education Malaysia, 15(1), 45–58.

Che Dahalan, N., & Othman, N. (2025). Teachers’ knowledge and readiness for AI integration in Malay language instruction under the School Transformation 2025 programme. Malaysian Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 88–102.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

El Garawany, N. (2024). The impact of AI-powered feedback on ESL learners’ writing accuracy and revision behaviour. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 112–125.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

Jamaluddin, S., Jamaluddin, N., & Jamaluddin, M. (2025). Malaysia’s national AI education roadmap: Opportunities, challenges, and implementation issues. Journal of Educational Policy and Practice, 20(1), 55–70.

Khan, M., Alharbi, M., & Ahmad, T. (2022). Teachers’ concerns about AI-based feedback: Accuracy, ethics, and pedagogical implications. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6245–6262.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Liu, Q., Wang, S., & Guo, M. (2023). The effectiveness of AI-driven writing support systems in improving second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1245–1263.

Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2023). Exploring EFL learners’ engagement with AI-based writing feedback. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–25.

Razak, A. F., & Norman, H. (2025). Vocational technology teachers’ readiness and perceptions of AI integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 11(1), 22–35.

RSIS International. (2025). AI integration in urban primary schools: A mixed-methods analysis of teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 15(2), 135–146.

Sivanganam, G., Yunus, M. M., & Mohd Said, N. (2025). ESL teachers’ attitudes and readiness towards AI integration in Malaysian classrooms. Asian Journal of English Language and Education, 13(1), 1–15.

Tai, T. Y., Zaini, S. Z., & Nasir, A. M. (2025). ESL teachers’ perceptions of using artificial intelligence to support differentiated instruction. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 17(1), 30–48.

Tahir, R., & Haron, N. (2025). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of AI-based classroom assessment: Opportunities and concerns. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 14(1), 77–90.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440.

Wu, Y., & Yan, H. (2023). AI-assisted writing feedback and its impact on learner motivation and accuracy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101–119.

Yilmaz, R., & Yildiz, M. (2021). The effect of AI-supported feedback on EFL students’ writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(6), 882–896.

Yunus, M. M., Ong, W. L., & Hashim, H. (2023). Malaysian teachers’ integration of emerging technologies in ESL teaching: Trends and challenges. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 57–76.

Zainuddin, S. Z. (2024). Technology acceptance and AI adoption among Malaysian primary school teachers. Journal of ICT in Education, 11(2), 40–55.

Zakaria, N., & Ponniah, K. (2021). Challenges of digital literacy and technology use among rural Malaysian primary school teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 45–58.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Thiruchelvan, T., & Zakaria, N. Y. K. (2026). ESL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF AI-POWERED WRITING ASSISTANTS IN LANGUAGE LEARNING. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELLING (IJEPC), 11(62), 1282–1295. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1162074