MENEROKA TAHAP PELAKSANAAN MOD PELIBATAN PEMBELAJARAN OLEH GURU NOVIS DALAM PENGAJARAN DI NEGERI KEDAH

EXPLORING THE LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION OF LEARNING ENGAGEMENT MODES BY NOVICE TEACHERS IN TEACHING IN THE STATE OF KEDAH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1162077

Keywords:

Efikasi Kendiri Guru (Teacher Self-Efficacy), Guru Novis (Novice Teachers), Model ICAP (ICAP Model), Pelibatan Murid (Student Engagement), Pedagogi Aktif (Active Pedagogy)

Abstract

Pelibatan murid merupakan indikator penting dalam menentukan keberkesanan proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran di bilik darjah, khususnya dalam konteks pendidikan abad ke-21 yang menekankan pembelajaran berpusatkan murid. Model ICAP menyediakan kerangka teori yang sistematik untuk memahami tahap pelibatan murid berdasarkan proses kognitif. Walau bagaimanapun, pelaksanaan mod pelibatan pembelajaran berasaskan Model ICAP dalam kalangan guru novis masih berhadapan dengan pelbagai halangan, termasuk jurang antara teori dan amalan pedagogi, kekangan pengalaman, motivasi dan efikasi kendiri. Justeru itu, kajian ini dijalankan untuk menilai tahap pelaksanaan serta meneroka pengalaman guru novis dalam mengaplikasikan mod pelibatan pembelajaran berasaskan Model ICAP di bilik darjah. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kaedah campuran eksplanatori berjujukan, di mana fasa kuantitatif melibatkan 243 responden menggunakan soal selidik skala Likert 5 mata dan dianalisis secara deskriptif serta inferensi menggunakan SPSS versi 29. Sementara itu, fasa kualitatif pula menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologi melalui persampelan bertujuan melibatkan lima peserta, dengan data temu bual separa berstruktur dianalisis secara tematik menggunakan Atlas.ti bagi meneroka pengalaman guru novis secara mendalam.  Dapatan menunjukkan tahap pelibatan aktif dan konstruktif guru novis mempunyai hubungan positif dan signifikan dengan tahap pelibatan keseluruhan, khususnya mod konstruktif (r = 0.763, p < 0.001) manakala mod aktif (r = 0.749, p < 0.001). Dapatan kualitatif menyokong dapatan kuantitatif, di mana guru novis mengaplikasikan strategi aktif dan konstruktif melalui tugasan berfikir aras tinggi, perbincangan kumpulan, pembentangan, dan aktiviti kolaboratif walaupun menghadapi kekangan tertentu. Kesimpulannya, Model ICAP berpotensi meningkatkan kualiti pelibatan pembelajaran murid sekiranya guru novis diberikan sokongan latihan pedagogi dan bimbingan profesional yang berterusan. Kajian ini mencadangkan agar sokongan pembangunan profesional yang berterusan, latihan pedagogi berfokuskan Model ICAP bagi membantu guru novis melaksanakan mod pelibatan pembelajaran secara lebih berkesan.

Student engagement is an important indicator in determining the effectiveness of teaching and learning processes in the classroom, particularly in the context of 21st-century education that emphasizes student-centered learning. The ICAP model provides a systematic theoretical framework for understanding students’ engagement levels based on cognitive processes. However, the implementation of ICAP-based learning engagement modes among novice teachers still faces various challenges, including the gap between theory and pedagogical practice, limited experience, motivation and self-efficacy. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the level of implementation and explore the experiences of novice teachers in applying ICAP-based learning engagement modes in the classroom. The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, where the quantitative phase involved 243 respondents using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, analyzed descriptively and inferentially using SPSS version 29. Meanwhile, the qualitative phase adopted a phenomenological approach through purposive sampling involving five participants, with semi-structured interview data analyzed thematically using Atlas.ti to explore the experiences of novice teachers in depth. The findings indicate that the levels of active and constructive engagement among novice teachers are positively and significantly related to overall engagement, particularly the constructive mode (r = 0.763, p < 0.001) and the active mode (r = 0.749, p < 0.001). The qualitative findings support the quantitative results, showing that novice teachers implement active and constructive strategies through higher-order thinking tasks, group discussions, presentations and collaborative activities, despite facing certain constraints. In conclusion, the ICAP model has the potential to enhance the quality of student engagement if novice teachers are provided with ongoing pedagogical training and professional guidance. The study recommends continuous professional development and ICAP-focused pedagogical training to assist novice teachers in implementing learning engagement modes more effectively.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aagaard, T., Bueie, A., & Frøytlog, J. I. J. (2025). Exploring simulated practice in teacher education: Opportunities to professionalize the teacher role. Education Sciences, 15(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020182

Abildinova, G., Temirkhanova, M., Kazhiakparova, Z., & Abdullah, L. N. (2025). The effectiveness of active teaching methods using digital technologies: An experimental study. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.6472

Adeoye, M. A., Obi, S. N., & Yahaya, A. K. (2025). Transformative impact of mentorship on building resilience and enhancing professional success: A systematic review of support strategies for novice teachers. Edulead: Journal of Education Management, 7(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.47453/edulead.v7i1.3416

Amran, M. S., Zain, S. M., Jamaludin, K. A., & Surat, S. (2021). Thinking about behavior: Perspective on meta-behavior in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 727116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727116

Awang, N. E., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2025). Barriers to implementing innovative pedagogy: A systematic review of challenges and strategic solutions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 679–698.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

Bicsak, Z. Á. (2024). Rephrasing the teacher role in the 21st century: Personal responsivenesand educational responsibility in a heterogeneous world. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 383–395.https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2024.00270

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Chandran, V. N., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Shukor, S. S., Ismail, N., Tahir, M. H. M., Mokhtar,M. M., & Zulkepli, N. (2022). Malaysian English Language Novice Teachers’

Challenges and Support during Initial Years of Teaching. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.24815/SIELE.V9I2.22974

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Chi, M. T. H., Boucher, N. S., & Arizona State University. (2023). Applying the ICAP framework to improve classroom learning.

Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2018). Translating the ICAP theory of cognitive engagement into practice. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1777–1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12626

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dack, H., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2025). Preparing novice teachers to differentiate instruction: Implications of a longitudinal study. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871241232419

Driessen, E. P., Wilson, A. E., Hall, I., Brewer, P., Odom, S., Ramsey, S. B., … & Ballen, C. J. (2024). Group work enhances student performance in biology: A meta-analysis. BioScience, 74(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae001

El Mansy, S. Y., Barbera, J., & Hartig, A. J. (2022). Investigating small group cognitive engagement in general chemistry learning activities using qualitative content analysis and the ICAP framework. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00276G

Getenet, S., & Tualaulelei, E. (2023). Using interactive technologies to enhance student engagement in higher education online learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2244597

Günüç, S., Yiğit, E., Artun, H., & Okur, M. (2022). Examining the relationships between student engagement, campus facilities, and technology integration among elementary teacher candidates. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 9(2), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i2.42884

Huang, L., & Wu, C. H. (2023). Students’ perception of engagement with technology during COVID 19 emergency remote learning. In O. Noroozi & I. Sahin (Eds.),Technology EnhancedLearning Environments in Education (pp. 33–58). ISTES Organization.

Karasova, J., & Nehyba, J. (2025). Novice teachers’ classroom behaviour management: Situations, responses and impact on student behaviour. British Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 2116–2141. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4166

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2026). Rancangan pendidikan Malaysia 2026–2035. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2024). The impact of school support for professional development on teachers' adoption of student centered pedagogy, students’ cognitive learning and abilities:A three level analysis.Computers & Education, 215, 105016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105016

Kwok, A., & Macfarlane, K. O. (2025). Strengthening early career teachers: Effective components of teacher induction programs. EdResearch for Action.

Maričić, M., Anđić, B., Mumcu, F., Rokos, L., Vondruška, J., Weinhandl, R., Lavicza, Z., Špernjak, A. (2024). Evaluating the quality of technology integration across seven European countries with the ICAP Technology Scale. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(4), 1135–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00341-y

Md Johar, E. (2022). A confirmatory factor analysis on teachers’ sense of efficacy scale for in service teachers in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 981–997.

Mohd Zabidi, Z., Abdullah, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2023). Exploring teacher collaboration: What’s inside the Malaysian PLC black box? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 8(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-03-2023-0020

Morgan, H. (2024). Using triangulation and crystallization to make qualitative studies trustworthy and rigorous. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844–1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071

Oranga, J., & Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative research: Essence, types and advantages. Open Access Library Journal, 10(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001

Ovenden-Hope, T., & Kirkpatrick, H. (2024). The Early Career Framework: Why Context Matters for Teacher Professional Development. Education Sciences,14(11),1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111261

Özbek, T., Wekerle, C., & Kollar, I. (2024). Fostering pre service teachers’ technology acceptance – does the type of engagement with tool related information matter? Education and Information Technologies, 29(???), 6139–6161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12047-2

Pacaci, C., Ustun, U., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2024). Effectiveness of conceptual change strategies in science education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(6),1263–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21887

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Paudel, M. R., & Shrestha, N. (2024). Students engagement in classroom teaching by innovative pedagogy: A desk based review of existing literature. JMC Research Journal, 13(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.3126/jmcrj.v13i1.73384

Pitkäniemi, H., Hirvonen, R., Heikka, J., & Suhonen, K. (2024). Teacher efficacy, its sources, and implementation in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53, 1705–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01713-w

Prananto, K., Cahyadi, S., Lubis, F. Y., & Hinduan, Z. R. (2025). Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students – a systematic literature review. BMC Psychology, 13, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w

Rahimi, A. R., & Sevilla Pavón, A. (2025). The role of interactive, constructive, active, and passive learning activities (ICAPCALL) in shaping students’ online engagement, and learning approaches to virtual exchange (SAVE): A bisymmetric approach. Smart Learning Environments, 12, 61.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00363-0

Ramsaroop, S., Mahase, M. F., & Petersen, N. (2024). Bridging the theory practice divide: Reflections of school based student teachers. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1558

Roeben, M., Vejvoda, J., Murböck, J., Fischer, F., Schultz-Pernice, F., Lohr, A., Stadler, M., Sailer, M., & Heitzmann, N. (2025). Simulations in Teacher Education: Learning to Diagnose Cognitive Engagement. Education Sciences,15(3),261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030261

Salleh, M. F. M., Rauf, R. A. A., Saat, R. M., & Ismail, M. H. (2022). Novice chemistry teachers’ instructional strategies in teaching mixed-ability classrooms. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.18066

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social emotional learning: Theory, research, and practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101830

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl.2),107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

Shank, M. K. (2023). Novice teachers’ training and support needs in evidence-based classroom management. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 67(4), 197–208.https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2023.2195361

Tanguay, C. L., & Many, J. E. (2022). New teachers’ perceptions of their impact on student learning while developing knowledge and skills to teach online. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.309

Thommen, D., Grob, U., Lauermann, F., Klassen, R. M., & Praetorius, A. K. (2022). Different levels of context-specificity of teacher self-efficacy and their relations with teaching quality. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 857526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857526

Tomaszewski, W., Xiang, N., Huang, Y., Western, M., McCourt, B., & McCarthy, I. (2022). The Impact of Effective Teaching Practices on Academic Achievement When Mediated by Student Engagement: Evidence from Australian High Schools. Education Sciences, 12(5), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050358

Toyon, M. A. S. (2021). Explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(5), 253–260.https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.1262

Tran, H. H., & Capps, D. K. (2025). Preservice science teachers’ self regulation of teaching while planning and enacting classroom questions: A cross case analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 47(9), 1085–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2358217

UNESCO. (2024). Global Education Monitoring Report 2024: Monitoring SDG 4.

UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000459876

Villaluz, M. A. (2024). Exploring novice teacher experiences: A phenomenology of self navigation in recently established schools. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(7), 2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1657

Wang, H., Sun, Y., Wang, W., & Liang, H. (2025). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ perceived workload, challenge hindrance stress, and work engagement: Aperson centeredapproach. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02537

Wang, N., & An, B. G. (2023). Improving teachers’ professional development through professional learning community: Voices from secondary school teachers at Malaysian Chinese independent schools. Heliyon, 9(6), e17515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17515

Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2024). Putting ICAP to the test: How technology enhanced learning activities are related to cognitive and affective motivational learning outcomes in higher education. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 16295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66069-y

Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3

Wong, Z. Y., Liem, G. A. D., Chan, M., & Datu, J. A. D. (2024). Student engagement and its association with academic achievement and subjective well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(1), 4875. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000833

Wu, X. N., Liao, H. Y., & Guan, L. X. (2024). Examining the influencing factors of elementary and high school STEM teachers’ self efficacy: A meta analysis. Current Psychology, 43(31), 25743–25759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06227-7

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Hamid, Z., & Shuib, H. (2026). MENEROKA TAHAP PELAKSANAAN MOD PELIBATAN PEMBELAJARAN OLEH GURU NOVIS DALAM PENGAJARAN DI NEGERI KEDAH: EXPLORING THE LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION OF LEARNING ENGAGEMENT MODES BY NOVICE TEACHERS IN TEACHING IN THE STATE OF KEDAH. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELLING (IJEPC), 11(62), 1320–1342. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1162077