DIRECTIONAL EFFECTS IN ROBOTIC MILLING OF UHMWPE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.824022Keywords:
Feed Direction, Pose-Dependent Compliance, Robotic Milling, Surface Roughness (Ra, Rq, Rz), UHMWPEAbstract
Industrial robots offer large workspaces and flexibility for machining, but their compliance-dominated dynamics can compromise surface quality. While vibration control in robotic machining is well studied for metals and fibre-reinforced composites, empirical guidance for soft-polymer finishing remains limited. As one of the first empirical studies on robotic finishing of UHMWPE, this work investigates the direction–compliance–roughness interaction by framing feed direction as a controllable parameter. This study explicitly demonstrates how feed direction interacts with pose-dependent compliance to systematically influence surface roughness in robotic milling of UHMWPE. This feasibility study investigates how feed direction affects surface roughness (Ra, Rq, Rz) in robotic milling of UHMWPE. Experiments were performed using a KUKA KR120 R2700 six-axis robot with fixed parameters: 9500 rpm spindle speed, 1080 mm/min feed rate, and dry finishing cuts at depths of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3mm. Surface roughness metrics were measured via contact profilometry using a standardized evaluation length. Due to kinematic constraints, X–Y toolpaths require different joint configurations; therefore, observed differences reflect the combination of feed-direction and pose-dependent stiffness anisotropy. Y-direction feeding produced lower Ra (1.64–1.87 µm) than X-direction feeding (1.66–1.94 µm). In contrast, X-direction feeding yielded lower Rq (2.0–2.5 µm) with strong linear predictability (R² > 0.99), compared with Y-direction Rq (2.35–2.40 µm). Rz exhibited depth-dependent behavior, with X performing better at shallow depth (0.2 mm) and Y at 0.3 mm, while tool adhesion showed little directional dependence. Overall, the findings provide evidence of direction-dependent roughness trade-offs: Y-direction may be preferred for average smoothness (Ra), whereas X-direction may be preferred when peak-sensitive control (Rq/Rz) is critical.
Downloads
References
Abellán-Nebot, J. V., Vila Pastor, C., & Siller, H. R. (2024). A Review of the Factors Influencing Surface Roughness in Machining and Their Impact on Sustainability. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 16, Issue 5). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051917
Cordes, M., Hintze, W., & Altintas, Y. (2019). Chatter stability in robotic milling. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 55, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2018.07.004
Da Silva, L. B., Yoshioka, H., Shinno, H., & Zhu, J. (2019). Tool orientation angle optimization for a multi-axis robotic milling system. International Journal of Automation Technology, 13(5), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2019.p0574
Guo, K., Zhang, Y., & Sun, J. (2022). Towards stable milling: Principle and application of active contact robotic milling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2022.103952
Ji, Y., & Liu, R. (2024). Research on the influence of cutter overhang length on robotic milling chatter stability. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76165-8
Joshi, R. C., Rai, J. K., Burget, R., & Dutta, M. K. (2024). Optimized inverse kinematics modeling and joint angle prediction for six-degree-of-freedom anthropomorphic robots with Explainable AI. ISA Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2024.12.008
Lai, Y. S., Lin, W. Z., Lin, Y. C., & Hung, J. P. (2024). Development of Surface Roughness Prediction and Monitoring System in Milling Process. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 14(1), 12797–12805. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.6664
Lestari, W. D., Anggoro, P. W., Ismail, R., Jamari, J., & Bayuseno, A. P. (2019). Optimization of CNC Milling Parameters through the Taguchi and RSM Methods for Surface Roughness of UHMWPE Acetabular Cup. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 10(2), 1762–1775.
Li, G., Xie, W., Wang, H., Chai, Y., Zhang, S., & Yang, L. (2023). Optimizing Processing Parameters and Surface Quality of TC18 via Ultrasonic-Assisted Milling (UAM): An Experimental Study. Micromachines, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061111
Liu, J., Niu, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Prediction of Surface Topography in Robotic Ball-End Milling Considering Tool Vibration. Actuators, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/act13020072
Liu, Y., Wang, L., Yu, Y., Zhang, J., & Shu, B. (2022). Optimization of redundant degree of freedom in robot milling considering chatter stability. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1360661/v1
Lopes, F. J., Completo, A., & Davim, J. P. (2021). Toolpath and machining parameters optimisation of the cavities of a knee prosthesis tibial insert. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 235(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420961678
Mohammadi, Y., & Ahmadi, K. (2022). Chatter in milling with robots with structural nonlinearity. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108523
Mousavi, S., Gagnol, V., Bouzgarrou, B. C., & Ray, P. (2018). Stability optimization in robotic milling through the control of functional redundancies. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 50, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.09.004
Ni, J., Dai, R., Yue, X., Zheng, J., & Feng, K. (2022). Contribution Ratio Assessment of Process Parameters on Robotic Milling Performance. Materials, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103566
Piska, M., & Urbancova, K. (2022). On the Machining of Joint Implant UHMWPE Inserts. MATEC Web of Conferences, 368, 01012. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202236801012
Sun, H., Ding, H., Deng, C., & Xiong, K. (2023). Efficient Prediction of Stability Boundaries in Milling Considering the Variation of Tool Features and Workpiece Materials. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 23(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218954
Wan Jusoh, W. N. S. E., Yahaya, M. I., Zakaria, S., Mahamad Basri, M. H., Daud, M. R., & Ismail, N. I. (2025). Simulation-driven in robotic milling of soft material: Evaluating parallel and equidistant toolpath strategies using SprutCAM. Academic Journal (EAJ) ESTEEM Academic Journal, 22, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.24191/esteem.v21iSeptember.6483.g4961
Wan Jusoh, W. N. S. E., Yahaya, M. I., Zakaria, S., Mahamd Basri, M. H., Daud, M. R., & Ismail, N. I. (2025). New approach to minimise surface roughness in Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) through robotic spindle speed control. ESTEEM Academic Journal, 21(March), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.24191/esteem.v21iMarch.4359.g3122
Wang, W., Guo, Q., Yang, Z., Jiang, Y., & Xu, J. (2023). A state-of-the-art review on robotic milling of complex parts with high efficiency and precision. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 79, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102436
Wen, J., Xie, F., Liu, X., & Yue, Y. (2023). Evolution and Development Trend Prospect of Metal Milling Equipment. In Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition) (Vol. 36, Issue 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-023-00865-x
Wu, K., Li, J., Zhao, H., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Review of Industrial Robot Stiffness Identification and Modelling. In Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (Vol. 12, Issue 17). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178719
Yan, Z., Ren, X., Zhao, H., & Chen, S. (2024). Investigating the Impact of Robotic Milling Parameters on the Surface Roughness of Al-Alloy Fabricated by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. Materials, 17(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194845
