BIOPHILIC DESIGN IN OFFICE INTERIORS FOR EMPLOYEE STRESS ALLEVIATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.824023

Keywords:

Biophilic Design, Office Spaces, Employee Stress, Qualitative Research, Spatial Interfaces

Abstract

In today's fast-paced office environments, employees commonly face high-intensity workloads, leading to increasingly severe stress and anxiety issues that impact their physical and mental well-being. Research indicates that biophilic design principles, which integrate natural elements into indoor spaces, offer an innovative approach to optimising office environments and alleviating employee stress. Previous biophilic design research has focused on the presence or absence of natural elements rather than spatial interface variations. Little is known about the Stress-relieving effects of biophilic elements on various spatial interfaces within office spaces, including ceilings, floors, walls, and desktops. Therefore, this study introduces an interface-based analytical perspective (ceiling, walls, floor, and tabletop). A total of eight experts were invited to form two four-person focus groups, each comprising an architect, an interior designer, a psychological counsellor, and a landscape designer. Data analysis utilised NVivo software to identify biophilic elements suitable for office interiors: green plants, natural materials, natural colours, the presence of water, natural forms, and natural imagery. The results indicate that biophilic elements exhibit specific interface distribution patterns, reflecting design priorities for particular interfaces(dominated by walls at 37.5%, followed by floors at 31.3%, with desktops at 17.5% and ceilings at 13.8%). Furthermore, distinct experiential mechanisms were identified for different surfaces: ceilings (indirect experience), desktops (direct experience), and walls/floors (dual experience). The study not only revealed the Stress-relieving effects weight of key elements such as ‘green plants on desktops’ (13.1%), ‘natural wall colours’ (11.9%), ‘green wall coverings(10.6%)’, ‘natural wall imagery(10.6%)’, ‘ground-level greenery(10.6%)’, natural materials(9.4%), and Ground-level water features(7.5%), Provides employers and designers with interface-based and user-specific resource allocation strategies, proposing future research directions to explore the stress-relieving effects of biophilic elements within diverse spatial interface combinations. To provide evidence-based design insights for optimising employee mental well-being through spatial interventions.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, H., Chen, Q., Jiang, T., Lv, B. Y., Li, N., Shu, L., Yu, T. L., Zhuo, L. J., Guan, Z. S., & Sohaib, T. M. (2018). Effects of Plant Activity on Mental Stress in Young Adults. HortScience, 53(1), 104-109. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=hEVkP-djbGxQO_qduYAtm3P1xKyO2TS2UQEfdb5CrJGU1W9txUoQiMA2uMeSme6c-CY_Mjze7L_xHKLvZkqqCL_B_ALqNdBRpmeU288GujT-Yw_NViVXogd7K-zVg6tFlibAsElRgqeaOBnO0b7okaEB0S4ytTCBQtnhW0DCyFo2JjkAAApuplCn7z ruMtb_oJxzadR_jAOCESilCS2g==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Aini, H. S. A. M. (2025). Research Methods In Built Environment Study.

Bettaieb, D. M., Mohammed, W., & Khawaji, S. (2023). Exploring Visual Biophilic Interior Design Features in Homes: An Experimental Study through a Virtual Environment Design. The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 18(1), 45-73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1662/CGP/v18i01/45-73

Burnard, M. D., & Kutnar, A. (2020). Human stress responses in office-like environments with wood furniture. Building Research & Information, 48(3), 316-330.

Chabada, M., Juras, P., & Durica, P. (2023). Influence of the active irrigation system on the vegetation façade. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,

Demirkol, A. K., & Önaç, A. K. (2024). Integratıng bıophılıc desıgn elements ınto offıce desıgns. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 102962.

DESIGN, B. (2014). 14 PATTERNS OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN.

Fukumoto, H., Shimoda, M., & Hoshino, S. (2024). The effects of different designs of indoor biophilic greening on psychological and physiological responses and cognitive performance of office workers. Plos one, 19(7), e0307934.

Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Weber, M. B. (2019). What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Qualitative health research, 29(10), 1483-1496.

Lei, Q., Lau, S., Yuan, C., & Qi, Y. (2022). Post-occupancy evaluation of the biophilic design in the workplace for health and wellbeing. Buildings, 12 (4), 417. In.

Roskams, M., & Haynes, B. (2020). A randomised field experiment to test the restorative properties of purpose-built biophilic “regeneration pods”. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 22(4), 297-312.

Tan, Y., Armutcuoğlu, V., & Aksu, M. M. (2024). Enhancing Next-Generation Workplaces by Developing Office Interior Architecture with Biophilic Elements. Proceedings of the International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism-ICCAUA,

Wilson, E. O. (1986). Biophilia. Harvard university press.

Yeo, L., Ling, G., Abd Ghafar, A., Mohamed, S., Othmani, N., Hamid, N. A., Mohamad, W. W., Hasan, R., & Aziz, S. (2023). The relationship between plant and humans in indoor environment: A pilot test during the COVID-19 pandemic. BIO Web of Conferences,

Yin, J., Arfaei, N., MacNaughton, P., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2019). Effects of biophilic interventions in office on stress reaction and cognitive function: A randomized crossover study in virtual reality. Indoor air, 29(6), 1028-1039.

Yin, J., Zhu, S., MacNaughton, P., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2018). Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Building and Environment, 132, 255-262.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-29

How to Cite

Fanwei , Z., Mustapa, N. D., & Yeo , L. B. (2026). BIOPHILIC DESIGN IN OFFICE INTERIORS FOR EMPLOYEE STRESS ALLEVIATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION (IJIREV), 8(24), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.824023