DESIGN FOR SAFETY (DFS) IN EDUCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.825011

Keywords:

Construction, DfS, Education, SbD

Abstract

Design for Safety (DfS) has emerged as a critical approach in the construction industry to eliminate or minimize occupational hazards through informed design decisions proactively. Despite increasing recognition of DfS principles, the integration of DfS into construction education and curriculum development remains fragmented and underexplored in the existing literature. Limited studies have systematically examined the intellectual structure, research evolution, and collaborative patterns of DfS in educational contexts, thereby constraining the development of comprehensive pedagogical frameworks for future construction professionals. Accordingly, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends related to DfS in education for construction. Bibliographic data were systematically retrieved from the Scopus database. The retrieved dataset was subsequently refined and standardized using OpenRefine to ensure data consistency and accuracy prior to analysis. Scopus Analyzer and VOSviewer software were employed to examine publication trends, citation structures, keyword co-occurrence patterns, and country-level collaboration networks. Following the screening and refinement process, a total of 744 relevant publications were identified and analysed. The findings reveal a substantial increase in publication output after 2015, indicating growing scholarly attention toward integrating safety-oriented design principles into construction education. Keyword co-occurrence analysis further identified dominant research themes in construction, health and safety, construction safety, Building Information Modeling (BIM), virtual reality, and prevention through design, reflecting the increasing influence of digital technologies and Industry 4.0 in safety education. In addition, country-level collaboration analysis demonstrated that the United States and the United Kingdom remain the leading contributors to DfS educational research. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the intellectual development, thematic evolution, and global research landscape of DfS in construction education, offering valuable insights for researchers, educators, policymakers, and industry practitioners seeking to advance proactive safety integration within construction curricula and professional training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Khoury, A., Hussein, S. A., Abdulwhab, M., Aljuboori, Z. M., Haddad, H., Ali, M. A., Abed, I. A., & Flayyih, H. H. (2022). Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811615

Alper, S. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2009). A systematic review of safety violations in industry. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(4), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.013

Alves, J. L., Borges, I. B., & De Nadae, J. (2021). Sustainability in complex projects of civil construction: Bibliometric and bibliographic review. Gestao e Producao, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389

Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0

Assyakur, D. S., & Rosa, E. M. (2022). Spiritual Leadership in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Aisyah : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v7i2.914

Azmi, W. F. W. M., & Misnan, M. (2022). A Knowledge Integration Approach for Design for Safety Body of Knowledge (DfSBoK). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i3/14651

Behm, M., Culvenor, J., & Dixon, G. (2014). Development of safe design thinking among engineering students. Safety Science, 63, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.018

Bouchaut, B., & Asveld, L. (2025). Responsible and safe innovation in education: an iGEM showcase. Journal of Responsible Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2445330

Chen, X., Chang-Richards, A. Y., Pelosi, A., Jia, Y., Shen, X., Siddiqui, M. K., & Yang, N. (2022). Implementation of technologies in the construction industry: a systematic review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(8), 3181–3209. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2021-0172

d’Entremont, K., & Merryweather, A. (2018). Board 87 : Integrating Product-Safety Curriculum to Enhance Design and Reinforce Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30125

di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Veronay, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq027

Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. In International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 162, pp. 101–114). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003

Foley, B., Howard, P., Toft, Y., & Hurd, M. (2016). Increasing safe design practice within the engineering curriculum. 259. https://consensus.app/papers/increasing-safe-design-practice-within-the-engineering-foley-howard/b3a1bb738ad654c1abd38e121b0b8c5f/

Gambatese, J. A., Hinze, J. W., & Haas, C. T. (1997). Tool to design for construction worker safety. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 3(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1997)3:1(32)

Gamil, Y., A. Abdullah, M., Abd Rahman, I., & Asad, M. M. (2020). Internet of things in construction industry revolution 4.0: Recent trends and challenges in the Malaysian context. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(5), 1091–1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-06-2019-0164

Gu, D., Li, T., Wang, X., Yang, X., & Yu, Z. (2019). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of electronic health and telemedicine research. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.007

Gunasekera, M., Ahmed, S., & Khan, F. (2019). Integration of process safety in equipment design: A framework for academic learning activity. Education for Chemical Engineers, 30, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2019.09.004

Ibrahim, C. C., Manu, P., Belayutham, S., Mahamadu, A., & Antwi-Afari, M. (2022). Design for safety (DfS) practice in construction engineering and management research: A review of current trends and future directions. Journal of Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104352

Jamieson, M., Lefsrud, L., Sattari, F., & Donald, J. (2020). Engineering Safety and Risk Management: A Structured Case Study Approach to Investigating Chemical Process Safety. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34558

Kelm, A., Laußat, L., Meins-Becker, A., Platz, D., Khazaee, M. J., Costin, A. M., Helmus, M., & Teizer, J. (2013). Mobile passive Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) portal for automated and rapid control of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on construction sites. Automation in Construction, 36, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.08.009

Khiste, G. P., & Paithankar, R. R. (2017). Analysis of Bibliometric term in Scopus. International Research Journal, 01(32), 78–83.

Livingstone, S., & Brake, D. R. (2010). On the rapid rise of social networking sites: New findings and policy implications. Children and Society, 24(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00243.x

Love, T. (2024). Safety in P–12 Engineering Courses within the Southern United States. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1425

Love, T., & Roy, K. (2024). Safety Factors and Accidents in P-12 Pre-Engineering and Engineering Design Courses: Results from a National Study (Fundamental). 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--44178

Love, T., Threeton, M., & Roy, K. (2023). A Safety Study on Educators of Technological and Engineering Design-Based Instruction in K-12 STEM Related Courses. Journal of Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.632

Misnan, M., Azmi, W., Mohamed, S., Ramly, Z., Yusof, Z., & Othman, N. (2017). Integration of Design Safety into Curricula in the Undergraduate Programs: The Academician Perspective. Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 07, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2017.73010

Park, C.-S., & Kim, H.-J. (2013). A framework for construction safety management and visualization system. Automation in Construction, 33, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.012

Pollock, M., & Sørensen, E. (2021). Reflections on inherently embedding safety teaching within a chemical engineering programme. Education for Chemical Engineers, 37, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.07.001

Qian, Y., Vaddiraju, S., & Khan, F. (2023). Safety education 4.0 – A critical review and a response to the process industry 4.0 need in chemical engineering curriculum. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106069

Sandri, O., Holdsworth, S., Maslen, S., & Hayes, J. (2022). Contextualising capabilities for public safety in undergraduate sustainability engineering education. Environmental Education Research, 29, 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2115464

Sherwood, G., Jones, C., Conklin, J., & Dodd, A. (2023). Quality and safety education for nurses: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Nursing Scholarship : An Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12876

Teizer, J., & Cheng, T. (2015). Proximity hazard indicator for workers-on-foot near miss interactions with construction equipment and geo-referenced hazard areas. Automation in Construction, 60, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.09.003

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems, 15(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004911

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

Van Gelder, P., Klaassen, P., Taebi, B., Walhout, B., Van Ommen, R., Van De Poel, I., Robaey, Z., Asveld, L., Balkenende, R., Hollmann, F., Van Kampen, E. J., Khakzad, N., Krebbers, R., De Lange, J., Pieters, W., Terwel, K., Visser, E., Van Der Werff, T., & Jung, D. (2021). Safe-by-Design in Engineering: An Overview and Comparative Analysis of Engineering Disciplines. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126329

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083

Wang, Y., Chen, Y.-W., Hu, X., & Mei, H. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and global trends in patient safety education for nursing students. Medicine, 103. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040163

Wilkins, J. R. (2011). Construction workers’ perceptions of health and safety training programmes. Construction Management and Economics, 29(10), 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.633538

Wu, Y. C. J., & Wu, T. (2017). A decade of entrepreneurship education in the Asia Pacific for future directions in theory and practice. In Management Decision (Vol. 55, Number 7, pp. 1333–1350). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518

Zain, A. Z. M., Rahman, I. A., Fadzil, S., Mohammad, W., & Zulkifly, S. (2025). Mapping the research landscape of occupational safety in vocational and workforce training: A bibliometric analysis. Multidisciplinary Reviews. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025324

Zhang, M., Shu, L., Luo, X., Yuan, M., & Zheng, X. (2022). Virtual reality technology in construction safety training: Extended technology acceptance model. Automation in Construction, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104113

Zhou, L., Sun, Y., Wang, J., Huang, H., Luo, J., Zhao, Q., & Xiao, M. (2024). Trends in patient safety education research for healthcare professional students over the past two decades: a bibliometric and content analysis. Medical Education Online, 29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2358610

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Ismail, F., Kamaruddin, T., Mohd, N. I., Ariffin, H. L. T., Shukery, N. M., Abd Wahid, S. N., & Shollunayagam, R. M. (2026). DESIGN FOR SAFETY (DFS) IN EDUCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION (IJIREV), 8(25), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.825011