TECHNO-ECONOMIC AND AGRICULTURAL VIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF AGRIVOLTAIC SYSTEMS IN HOT ARID REGIONS: A SIMULATION-BASED CASE STUDY IN ASWAN, EGYPT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.826008

Keywords:

Economic Feasibility, Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), Photovoltaic Simulation, System Advisor Model (SAM), Ground Cover Ratio (GCR), Tomato yield

Abstract

Agrivoltaic systems are increasingly recognized as a dual-use strategy for combining crop production and photovoltaic electricity generation on the same land. However, their integrated technical, agricultural, and economic performance under the hot-arid conditions of southern Egypt remains insufficiently investigated. This study evaluates the viability of a tomato-based agrivoltaic system in Aswan, Egypt, using a comparative simulation framework based on a fixed land area of 1 hectare. A 70% photovoltaic-coverage scenario was used as the PV-only reference, while a 50% coverage scenario represented the agrivoltaic system. Photovoltaic performance and financial outcomes were simulated using the System Advisor Model (SAM), whereas tomato productivity was estimated through a literature-based approach using yield-reduction factors derived from published agrivoltaic experiments. Land-use productivity was assessed using the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), while PV-system financial performance was evaluated using installed cost, Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) over a 25-year analysis period.  The agricultural revenue was estimated separately using projected tomato yield, market price, and farming costs. The 70% PV-only system generated 3,133.9 MWh annually, compared with 2,226.5 MWh for the 50% agrivoltaic system, representing an approximately 29.0% reduction in electricity generation resulting from the lower installed PV capacity. Under the literature-derived base-case assumption of a 29% shading-related yield reduction, tomato production was estimated at 28.4–29.8 t/ha. The agrivoltaic system achieved an LER of 1.39–1.42, indicating a 39–42% improvement in combined land productivity relative to separate crop and photovoltaic production. Both scenarios achieved an IRR of 11.8% and an LCOE of 3.8 cents/kWh, while the PV-only and agrivoltaic systems recorded positive NPVs of USD 129,800 and USD 91,800, respectively. These findings indicate that agrivoltaics can provide a technically feasible, economically viable, and land-efficient food–energy option for hot-arid regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Agele, H. A., Proctor, K., Murthy, G. & Higgins, C. (2021). A case study of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon var. legend) production and water productivity in agrivoltaic systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052850

Ali Abaker Omer, A., Li, M., Zhang, F., Hassaan, M. M. E., El Kolaly, W., Zhang, X., Lan, H., Liu, J. & Liu, W. (2025). Impacts of agrivoltaic systems on microclimate, water use efficiency, and crop yield: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 221, 115930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115930

Barron-Gafford, G. A., Murphy, P., Salazar, A., Lepley, K., Rouini, N., Barnett-Moreno, I. & Macknick, J. E. (2025). Agrivoltaics as a climate-smart and resilient solution for midday depression in photosynthesis in dryland regions. Npj Sustainable Agriculture, 3(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00073-1

Chopdar, R. K., Sengar, N., Giri, N. C. & Halliday, D. (2024a). Comprehensive review on agrivoltaics with technical, environmental and societal insights. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 197, 114416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114416

Climate data. (2026). Aswan climate: Weather Aswan & temperature by month. https://en.climate-data.org/africa/egypt/aswan-governorate/aswan-6344/

Dupraz, C. (2024). Assessment of the ground coverage ratio of agrivoltaic systems as a proxy for potential crop productivity. Agroforestry Systems, 98(8), 2679–2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00906-3

Fangary, A. M., Shehata, H. M. A. & Ewis, D. M. (2026). The Economic Impact of Recent Climate Changes on Tomato Production in Egypt. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.21608/jassd.2026.461286.1104

Garrod, A., Hussain, S. N. & Ghosh, A. (2024). The technical and economic potential for crop based agrivoltaics in the United Kingdom. Solar Energy, 277, 112744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2024.112744

Global Solar Atlas. (2026a). Global Solar Atlas. https://globalsolaratlas.info/download/egypt

Hoshikawa, K., Pham, D., Ezura, H., Schafleitner, R. & Nakashima, K. (2021a). Genetic and Molecular Mechanisms Conferring Heat Stress Tolerance in Tomato Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.786688

Hoshikawa, K., Pham, D., Ezura, H., Schafleitner, R. & Nakashima, K. (2021b). Genetic and Molecular Mechanisms Conferring Heat Stress Tolerance in Tomato Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.786688

Kujawa, A., Kornas, J., Hanrieder, N., González Rodríguez, S., Hristov, L., Fernández Solas, Á., Wilbert, S., Blanco, M. J., Berzosa Álvarez, L., Martínez Gallardo, A., Amate González, A., Casas Fernandez, M., Palmero Luque, F. J., Godoy, M. L., Alonso-García, M. del C., Carballo, J. A., Zarzalejo Tirado, L. F., Cornaro, C. & Pitz-Paal, R. (2025). Tomato Yield Under Different Shading Levels in an Agrivoltaic Greenhouse in Southern Spain. AgriEngineering, 7(6), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7060178

Naim, Y. Ben, Ladell, C. & Cohen, Y. (2025). Agri-Photovoltaic technology allows dual use of land for tomato production and electricity generation. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 43717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27602-9

SAM. (2026a). Welcome - System Advisor Model - SAM. https://sam.nlr.gov

Santos Rocha, J., Sanchez, Y. & Fathallah, H. (2023). Climate-smart policies to enhance Egypt’s agrifood system performance and sustainability. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc8718en

Scarano, A., Semeraro, T., Calisi, A., Aretano, R., Rotolo, C., Lenucci, M. S., Santino, A., Piro, G. & De Caroli, M. (2024). Effects of the Agrivoltaic System on Crop Production: The Case of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Applied Sciences, 14(7), 3095. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14073095

Tonita, E. M., Russell, A. C. J., Valdivia, C. E. & Hinzer, K. (2023). Optimal ground coverage ratios for tracked, fixed-tilt, and vertical photovoltaic systems for latitudes up to 75°N. Solar Energy, 258, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.04.038

Trommsdorff, M., Campana, P. E., Macknick, J., Fernández Solas, A., Gorjian, S. & Tsanakas, I. (2025). Dual Land Use for Agriculture and Solar Power Production: Overview and Performance of Agrivoltaic Systems. https://doi.org/10.69766/XAEU5008

Warmann, E., Jenerette, G. D. & Barron-Gafford, G. A. (2024). Agrivoltaic system design tools for managing trade-offs between energy production, crop productivity and water consumption. Environmental Research Letters, 19(3), 034046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad2ab8

Zainali, S., Lu, S. M., Fernández-Solas, Á., Cruz-Escabias, A., Fernández, E. F., Zidane, T. E. K., Honningdalsnes, E. H., Nygård, M. M., Leloux, J., Berwind, M., Trommsdorff, M., Amaducci, S., Gorjian, S. & Campana, P. E. (2025). Modelling, simulation, and optimisation of agrivoltaic systems: a comprehensive review. Applied Energy, 386, 125558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125558

Zhang, W., Hendriks, P.-W., Uchanski, M., Page, S., Renwick, A., Maxwell, T., Kaiser, C., Dong, J. & de Koning, W. (2025). Climatic and design tipping points in agrivoltaic crop production systems. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 45(6), 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01060-z

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Ibrahim , M. E. S. M., Adzman , M. R., & Madbouly, E. (2026). TECHNO-ECONOMIC AND AGRICULTURAL VIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF AGRIVOLTAIC SYSTEMS IN HOT ARID REGIONS: A SIMULATION-BASED CASE STUDY IN ASWAN, EGYPT. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION (IJIREV), 8(26), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.826008