MODERATING EFFECT OF AGING POPULATION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VIRTUAL TEAM COHESIVENESS AND TEAM PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.827038Keywords:
Innovation, Radical Innovation, HRMAbstract
Digital communication has made it easier for people to work together by breaking down organisational borders and allowing virtual teams to form. These teams, made up of people who live in different places, rely on computer-mediated communication, which makes it harder to build trust, stay together, and work together. This study evaluates the impact of virtual team cohesiveness on team performance and explores the moderating influence of ageing demographic cohorts (Baby Boomers, Generation X, Generation Y). We used Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to look at data from 500 Malaysian academic personnel who were teaching online. The findings demonstrate that cohesiveness, trust, and the use of information and communication technology (ICT) substantially affect performance. Additionally, generational differences influence the cohesiveness–performance relationship: younger groups gain more from cohesive interactions, whereas older groups depend more on trust and regulated communication. The results underscore age-sensitive approaches for overseeing. virtual teams.
Downloads
References
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.
Hidayat, A. S., & Pok, W. C. (2025). Empowering SMEs innovation through intangible factors. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00437-w
Knowledge management and SMEs’ digital transformation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. (2025). Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(3), 100728.
Markides, C. (2019). Game-changing strategies: How to create innovative business models. Jossey-Bass
Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467–477.
Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909–920.
Mohd Yusof, A. N., Dzulkalnie, N., Mohd Shukor, S. A., Sumardi, N. A., & Kamarulzaman, M. D. (2024). A study on the mediating effect of knowledge management capability between HRM practices and radical innovation capability in Malaysia SME ICT. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(2.2), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.112.2.16395
Nguyen, T. H., Newby, M., & Macaulay, L. (2021). Information technology adoption in SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Information & Management, 58(1), 103–115.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313.
Rizq, A. T., & Parveen, M. (2025). Harnessing HR dynamics: Key to competitive advantage and sustainability in SMEs. Access to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy, 6(1), 217–241.
The influence of knowledge management on innovation and organizational performance. (2025). Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100793.
