VALUE FOR MONEY AND YOUTH RIDERSHIP IN URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT: EVIDENCE FROM KUALA LUMPUR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.827041Keywords:
Public Transport, Young Adults, Affordability, Subsidies, Service Quality, Ridership Intention, Urban MobilityAbstract
This study examines public transport usage behaviour among young adults in Kuala Lumpur, with particular emphasis on travel frequency, mode choice, perceived affordability, service quality, and future usage intention. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behaviour, Public Choice Theory, and the Value-for-Money framework, the study analyses survey data collected from 108 respondents aged 18 to 25 years. Descriptive and inferential analyses are employed to evaluate patterns of use and identify key determinants of ridership behaviour. The findings indicate that while public transport is widely perceived as affordable and cost-saving largely due to government subsidy schemes such as student discounts and monthly passes usage remains irregular for many young adults. Rail-based services, particularly the LRT and MRT, emerge as the most preferred modes owing to their speed and network coverage, alongside increasing evidence of multimodal travel. Correlation results reveal that affordability, subsidies, safety, service sufficiency, and cleanliness significantly influence intention to continue using public transport, with safety and service sufficiency exerting the strongest effects. The study is significant in highlighting the need to have an overall strategy in place to retain young commuters to promote sustained youth mobility through public transport in developing cities. The findings also provide implications for public transport planning and public transport strategies in developing cities in general.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, G. A., Kumaravelu, J., Goh, Y. N., & Dara Singh, K. S. (2021). Understanding the intention to revisit a destination by expanding the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 25(2), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-12-2019-0109
Almlöf, E., Rubensson, I., Cebecauer, M., & Jenelius, E. (2021). Who continued travelling by public transport during COVID-19? Socioeconomic factors explaining travel behaviour in Stockholm 2020 based on smart card data. European Transport Research Review, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00488-0
Bangura, A. K., Mensah, J., & Bizos, A. (2023). Theoretical Grounding in African Research.
Chee Hoo, W., Waheeda, A., & Reesha, A. (2023). Factors influencing passenger satisfaction at public transport in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Journal of Project Management Practice, 3, 1–15.
Chee Hoo, W., Waheeda, A., & Reesha, A. (2023). Factors Influencing the Passenger Satisfaction at Public Transport in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In Journal of Project Management Practice (JPMP) (Vol. 3).
Choong, M. Y. (2024, June 16). Public transport ridership goes up. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2024/06/16/public-transport-ridership-goes-up
Chohan, U. W. (2024). Public choice and public value. Routledge.
Downey, L., Fonzone, A., Fountas, G., & Semple, T. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on future public transport use in Scotland. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 163, 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.06.005
Free Malaysia Today. (2024, July 8). Klang Valley’s low MRT ridership and how to fix it. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2024/07/08/klang-valleys-low-mrt-ridership-and-how-to-fix-it/
Fauzi, M. A., Hanafiah, M. H., & Kunjuraman, V. (2024). Tourists’ intention to visit green hotels: Building on the theory of planned behaviour and the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Tourism Futures, 10(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-01-2022-0008
Goerlandt, F., & Pulsifer, K. (2022). An exploratory investigation of public perceptions towards autonomous urban ferries. Safety Science, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105496
Guzman, L. A., & Hessel, P. (2022). The effects of public transport subsidies for lower-income users on public transport use: A quasi-experimental study. Transport Policy, 126, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.016
Guzman, L. A., Cantillo-Garcia, V. A., Arellana, J., & Sarmiento, O. L. (2023). User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá. Transportation, 50(3), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-02110260-x
Hamidun, R., Sarani, R., Mhd Yunin, N. A., Mohd Zulkiffli, N. S., Roslan, A., & Ho, J. S. (2023). Factors influencing the use of MRT service in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Construction, 3(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v3i2.9629
Hamzah, M. I., Wahab, S. N., Abd Rashid, M. H., & Voon, B. H. (2023). Switching intention, word-of-mouth and quality of public transport services: Evidence from Kuala Lumpur conurbation. Multimodal Transportation, 2(3), Article 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2023.100082
Harumain, Y. A. S., Zaid, S. M., Ching, Nordin, G. H., Woodcock, N. A., & San, D. &. (2024). Perceptions on Public Transportation Safety Among Female Users in Malaysia. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 24(1), 76–89.
https://ijie.um.edu.my/index.php/jdbe/article/view/47321
HM Treasury. (2022). The Green Book: Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation (Value for Money supplementary guidance). UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent
Homer, S. T., Berezina, E., Chaouche, S. S., & Gill, C. M. H. D. (2024). Co-designing urban transport solutions with Southeast Asian young adults. Transportation Planning and Technology, 47(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2023.2279301
Ibrahim, A. N. H., Borhan, M. N., Yusoff, N. I. M., Ismail, A., Yazid, M. R. M., Yunin, N. A. M., & Sotaro, Y. (2021). Gender and age do matter: Exploring the effect of passengers’ gender and age on the perception of light rail transit service quality in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sustainability, 13(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020990
Ibrahim, A. N. H., Borhan, M. N., Osman, M. H., Mat Yazid, M. R., & Md Rohani, M. (2022). The influence of service quality on users’ perceived satisfaction with light rail transit service in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Mathematics, 10(13), Article 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132213
Irtema, H. I. M., Ismail, A., Borhan, M. N., Das, A. M., & Alshetwi, A. B. Z. (2018). Case study of the behavioural intentions of public transportation passengers in Kuala Lumpur. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(4), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.05.007
Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N. A., & Al-Alawi, A. N. (2024). Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Technology in Society, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521
Kayzel, T. (2021). Towards a politics of restraint public choice theory in the Dutch labour party of the 1970s. Tijdschrift Voor Sociale En Economische Geschiedenis, 18(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.18352/tseg.1198
Kim Mee, C., Subramaniam, G., Ating, R., & Separa, L. A. C. (2022). Willingness to use public transport in Kuala Lumpur and Manila. Environment–Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(21), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i21.3751
Noor, N. F. M., Kadir Shahar, H., Hamid, T. A., Zainalaludin, Z., Ahmad, S. A., Rokhani, F. Z., Ujang, N., Yusoff, I. S. M., & Akahbar, S. A. N. (2022). Understanding travel behavior and sustainability of current transportation system for older adults in Malaysia: A scoping review. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 14140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114140
Olabayonle, O. A., Rijal Mohamad, M., Bachok, S., Osman, M. M., Zarif, M., Zahari, M., Athifah, N., Kadir, A., & Mohamad, M. R. (2023). An Assessment of Gender Disparity That Exists in The Transit Service Provision: A Case Study of MRT Feeder Bus Service In Klang Valley, Malaysia. In Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners (Vol. 21).
Ogiemwonyi, O. (2022). Factors influencing generation Y green behaviour on green products in Nigeria: An application of theory of planned behaviour. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 13, Article 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100164
Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Estefanio, A., Tan, A. S., Videña, J. C., Villanueva, R. A., Chuenyindee, T., & Nadlifatin, R. (2023). Determining factors affecting passenger satisfaction of “Jeepney” in Philippine urban areas: The role of service quality in sustainable urban transportation. Sustainability, 15(2), Article 1223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021223
Palm, M., Allen, J., Zhang, Y., Tiznado-Aitken, I., Batomen, B., Farber, S., & Widener, M. (2024). Facing the future of transit ridership: Shifting attitudes towards public transit and auto ownership during COVID-19. Transportation, 51(2), 645–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10344-2
Pattamatta, M., Chapple, I., & Listl, S. (2024). The value-for money of preventing and managing periodontitis: Opportunities and challenges. In Periodontology 2000. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12569
Pingle, M., & Lim, J. (2021). Guilt, love, and the behavioral enrichment of Public Choice Theory.
Ramli, R., Zainol, R., & Yaacob, N. (2023). Perception of Persons with Disabilities Groups on Accessibility and Connectivity of Public Transportation Infrastructure in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In International Journal of Property Science (Vol. 13).
Samuel, T. (2024). Petroleum subsidy and the future of Nigeria’s oil sector: From consumer relief to market deregulation. Rapid Journals for Social Sciences, 1(10), 1–15.
Scott, Z., Bedenham, G., & Stefan, C. (2025). Assessing Value for Money in Prearranged Financing for Disasters: A Practical Framework 2 Supporting Value for Money In Pre-Arranged Financing For Disasters: A Practical Framework Supporting Value For Money In Pre-Arranged Financing For Disasters: A Practical Framework.
Sukor, N. S. A., Airak, S., & Hassan, S. A. (2021). “More than a free bus ride”: Exploring young adults’ perceptions of free bus services using a qualitative approach. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 3294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063294
Thomas, M., DeCillia, B., Santos, J. B., & Thorlakson, L. (2022). Great expectations: Public opinion about energy transition. Energy Policy, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112777
Wang, Q. C., Ren, Y. T., Liu, X., Chang, R. D., & Zuo, J. (2023). Exploring the heterogeneity in drivers of energy-saving behaviours among hotel guests: Insights from the theory of planned behaviour and personality profiles. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107012
Wong, F. W. M. H., Foley, A., Del Rio, D. F., Rooney, D., Shariff, S., Dolfi, A., & Srinivasan, G. (2022). Public perception of transitioning to a low-carbon nation: a Malaysian scenario. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,24(10),3077–3092.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02345-7
Zhao, J. (2024). Addressing the elephant in the room: How do we understand value for money in transport public–private partnerships? Cities, 154, Article 105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105401
