THE EXPECTATION GAP IN E-COMMERCE: HOW TRANSPARENCY SHAPES CONSUMER TRUST AND BEHAVIOUR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.828020

Keywords:

Consumer Trust and Behaviour, E-Commerce, Transparency and Legal Exposure

Abstract

Consumers form expectations in online shopping through product representations, delivery information, packaging disclosures, and platform-mediated communication. When actual experiences fail to match these expectations, dissatisfaction and post-purchase conflict may arise. Although prior studies have examined customer satisfaction and trust in e-commerce, limited research has explored how expectation management intersects with transparency and consumer legal awareness in shaping post-purchase outcomes. This study addresses that gap by examining how transparency and realistic communication moderate expectation–reality gaps and influence consumer dissatisfaction, behavioural responses, and awareness of consumer protection rights in Malaysia. A qualitative-dominant mixed-method exploratory approach was employed, integrating literature synthesis with primary qualitative data collected through open-ended online surveys from 40 households in Shah Alam. Thematic analysis identified five interrelated themes: representational misalignment, delivery realism gaps, packaging transparency deficits, platform-mediated expectation formation, and legal awareness. The findings demonstrate that inaccurate product representations, unrealistic delivery promises, inadequate packaging transparency, and platform-generated cues contribute significantly to expectation–reality gaps and consumer dissatisfaction. Conversely, transparent communication and realistic expectation management reduce negative post-purchase behaviours and strengthen consumer trust. The study contributes to e-commerce and consumer behaviour literature by linking expectation management, transparency practices, and consumer protection awareness within a unified post-purchase framework. The findings provide practical guidance for retailers, digital platforms, and policymakers seeking to strengthen consumer trust, improve platform accountability, and reduce post-purchase disputes in online retail environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anizah Zainuddin, Sarah Irdina Ridzwan, Sarah Batrisyia Ridzwan., (2022), Will Modest Fashion Industry Survive? Covid-19 Puts Fashion Modest Business to the Test, Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, 4(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajrbm.2022.4.3.31

Anizah Zainuddin & Sarah Addeany Ridzwan, Deliberate Discomfort: The Ethical Implications And Consequences Of Hurting Customers' Feelings, International Journal of Business and Technology Management e-ISSN: 2682-7646 | Vol. 7, No. 1, 325-333, 2025 https://asianscholarsnetwork.com/asnet-journals

Anizah Zainuddin & Sarah Addeany Ridzwan, Unpacking Consumer Preferences: The Motivations Behind Self-service Technology Adoption In Retail, International Journal of Business and Technology Management e-ISSN: 2682-7646 | Vol. 7, No. 1, 592-602, 2025 https://asianscholarsnetwork.com/asnet-journals

Awad, A. M., & Othman, A. K. (2024). False advertising and consumer online purchase behaviour. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 12(2). Retrieved from https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/107931

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Consumer Protection Act 1999 (Malaysia).

Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725–737.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Lee, G.-G., & Lin, H.-F. (2005). Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550510581485

Mokhtar, M., Yusoff, S., Asmuni, S., & Fauzi, N. A. M. (2020). Online shopping behaviour among young adults in Malaysia. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 8(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v8i1.6298

Nurhayati Abdul Ghani. (2023). Online dispute resolution for consumers of e-commerce in Malaysia: A preliminary study. e-Jurnal Penyelidikan dan Inovasi, 12(4), 299–311. https://ejpi.uis.edu.my/index.php/ejpi/article/view/299

Roslan, R., et al. (2025). Legal protection of e-consumers in Malaysia. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.

Online transactions record highest number of complaints. (2026, January 26). The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2026/01/26/online-transactions-record-highest-number-of-complaints

Hong Kong consumer watchdog records 17,000 online shopping complaints in 2024. (2025, August 14). South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/hong-kong-economy/article/3321856/hong-kong-consumer-watchdog-records-17000-online-shopping-complaints-2024

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Zainuddin, A., Ridzwan, S. A., & Ridzwan, S. I. (2026). THE EXPECTATION GAP IN E-COMMERCE: HOW TRANSPARENCY SHAPES CONSUMER TRUST AND BEHAVIOUR. ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SME’S (AIJBES), 8(28), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.828020