AN INTEGRATED ISLAMIC SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP MODEL FOR EMPOWERING PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.828025Keywords:
Disability Empowerment, Inclusive Entrepreneurship, Islamic Social Entrepreneurship, Islamic Social Finance, Maqasid Al-Shariah, Persons with DisabilitiesAbstract
This study develops an Integrated Islamic Social Entrepreneurship Model (IISEM) for empowering Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) in Malaysia through a holistic framework that integrates Islamic values, social entrepreneurship principles, and disability-inclusive empowerment practices. The study addresses the limitations of existing social entrepreneurship models, which are predominantly rooted in Western paradigms and often overlook the roles of spirituality, Islamic ethical principles, and Shariah-compliant social finance mechanisms in promoting sustainable entrepreneurial empowerment among Muslim PWDs. Guided by the Islamic worldview (tasawwur Islami) and the objectives of maqasid al-shariah, this study adopts a qualitative phenomenological approach to explore the lived experiences of Muslim entrepreneurs with disabilities. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 18 entrepreneurs with disabilities and seven key informants representing policymakers, Islamic finance institutions, and disability-related organisations. The data were further enriched through focus group discussions and document analysis. All qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis supported by NVivo 12 software. The findings reveal five interrelated themes that shape entrepreneurial empowerment among Muslim PWDs: (1) Spiritual and Ethical Foundations, where faith, sincerity (ikhlas), trustworthiness (amanah), perseverance (sabr), and reliance on Allah (tawakkul) strengthen entrepreneurial motivation and resilience; (2) Inclusive Islamic Financing, highlighting the importance of zakat, waqf, and qard al-hasan as mechanisms for sustainable entrepreneurial support; (3) Entrepreneurial Resilience and Adaptive Capacity, reflecting the ability of entrepreneurs to overcome disability-related and market challenges through innovation and persistence; (4) Community-Based Support and Social Capital, involving the contributions of family, mentors, non-governmental organisations, religious institutions, and government agencies; and (5) Operationalisation of Maqasid al-Shariah, which emphasises the preservation of human dignity, welfare, justice, and social inclusion. These themes were subsequently synthesised into the Integrated Islamic Social Entrepreneurship Model (IISEM), which positions entrepreneurship as a form of ibadah and integrates spiritual, financial, entrepreneurial, social, and developmental dimensions within a unified empowerment framework. The study contributes to the social entrepreneurship literature by extending existing empowerment models through an Islamic epistemological perspective and by providing a contextualised framework for addressing the multidimensional challenges faced by Muslim entrepreneurs with disabilities. Practically, the model offers valuable guidance for policymakers, Islamic social finance institutions, and community development agencies in designing inclusive and sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems for PWDs.
Downloads
References
Abd Hamid, N. Z., et al. (2023). Enabling social entrepreneurship for the disabled. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(24), 1–8.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
Al-Mubarak, T., & Osmani, N. M. (2021). Applications of maqasid al-shariah and maslahah in Islamic business and entrepreneurship. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(7), 1024–1041.
Ascarya, A., & Sakti, A. (2024). Islamic social finance and inclusive economic empowerment: Evidence from Muslim communities. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(1), 45–63.
Auda, J. (2021). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach (revised ed.). International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Stanford University.
Department of Social Welfare Malaysia. (2023). Statistics of persons with disabilities registered with the Department of Social Welfare Malaysia. Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Person with disability statistics, Malaysia, 2023. Department of Statistics Malaysia.
Dusuki, A. W. (2023). Maqasid al-shariah and sustainable socio-economic development: Contemporary perspectives. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 15(3), 285–301.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076.
Haneef, M. A., Pramanik, A. H., & Mohammed, M. O. (2023). Islamic social finance for vulnerable communities: Theory and practice. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 36(2), 3–22.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Institute for Public Health. (2020). National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019: Healthcare demand and health literacy. Ministry of Health Malaysia.
International Labour Organization. (2022). Global employment trends for persons with disabilities. International Labour Organization.
Islam, R., et al. (2023). Islamic social funds to foster Yunusian social business ventures. Administrative Sciences, 13(4), 102.
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
Mendoza, X. L. D. (2023). Entrepreneurial capability and engagement of persons with disabilities toward a framework for inclusive entrepreneurship. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17130
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90-97.
OECD. (2023). Disability, work and inclusion: Mainstreaming in all policies and practices. OECD Publishing.
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Disability, work and inclusion: Mainstreaming in all policies and practices. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
Putnam, R. D. (2020). The upswing: How America came together a century ago and how we can do it again. Simon & Schuster.
Ramadani, V., Dana, L. P., Ratten, V., & Tahiri, S. (2024). Religious values and entrepreneurial behaviour: Emerging perspectives from Muslim societies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(1), 55–78.
Renko, M., Parker Harris, S., & Caldwell, K. (2023). Disability entrepreneurship: Current evidence and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(5), 1458–1484.
Shakespeare, T. (2018). Disability: The basics. Routledge.
Shuhairimi Abdullah, Noor Salwani Hussin, Hassad Hassan, Suzana Sulaiman (2026). Empowerment of Social Entrepreneurs among Poverished Persons with Disabilities (Asnaf Oku) Through Social Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Perlis. 10(14), https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0017.
United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Disability inclusion and employment in Malaysia. UNDP Malaysia.
United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Improving people with disabilities' access to employment and protection in Malaysia. UNDP Malaysia.
World Health Organization. (2023). Disability. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. PublicAffairs.
Zahara, J. N., Ryandono, M. N. H., & Munifatussaidah, A. (2025). Islamic social entrepreneurship in realizing social inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Economics, Business and Accountancy Ventura.
