FROM PHRASE MEMORISATION TO COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE: A GENRE-BASED MODEL FOR SMCP TRAINING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1163010Keywords:
Communicative Competence, ESP, Maritime English, Standard Marine Communication PhrasesAbstract
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) introduced the Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCP) to standardise communication and enhance safety in multilingual maritime environments. Despite its institutional importance, empirical studies consistently demonstrate a divergence between prescribed SMCP structures and actual communicative practices during shipboard and VHF radio interactions. Seafarers frequently adapt, simplify, or reorganise standard phrases in response to operational constraints, suggesting that current instructional approaches may inadequately prepare learners for real-world communication demands. This paper addresses this gap by reconceptualising SMCP as a genre-based communicative practice rather than a fixed set of linguistic forms. Drawing on genre theory, communicative competence, and the transactional model of communication, the study proposes an integrated pedagogical framework that emphasises both structural awareness and strategic language use. The model outlines a series of pedagogical stages designed to develop learners’ ability to interpret, construct, and adapt SMCP in authentic maritime contexts. By shifting the focus from memorisation to communicative performance, this study contributes to the advancement of Maritime English pedagogy and offers practical implications for training institutions aiming to align language instruction with the realities of professional maritime communication.
Downloads
References
Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2010). Global markets, global challenges: The position of maritime English in today’s shipping industry. English in the European context: The EHEA challenge, 151, 174.
Boström, M. (2020). Mind the Gap! A quantitative comparison between ship-to-ship communication and intended communication protocol. Safety Science, 123, 104567.
DeFleur, M. H., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & DeFleur, M. L. (Eds). (2005). Fundamental Of human communication (3rd ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Demydenko, N. (2012). Teaching Maritime English: A Linguistic Approach. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, 2, 249-254.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Foulger, D. (2004). Models of the communication process. Brooklyn, New Jersey, 1-13.
Johnson, B. (1994). English in maritime radiotelephony. World Englishes, 13(2), 83-91.
Pritchard, B. (2003). Maritime Communications and IMO SMCP 2001.
Rosedi, S. R. B. H. M. (2024). The use of gamification in improving student engagement in learning the standard marine communication phrases (SMCP). KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, 16(1), 1-20.
Swain, M., & Canale, M. (1982). The role of grammar in a communicative approach to second language teaching and testing.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Trenkner, P. (2000). Maritime English- An attempt of an imperfect definition in: Proceedings of 2nd IMLA Workshop on Maritime English in Asia. WOME (2A), 1-8. China.
Trenkner, P., & Cole, C.W. (2004). Profilling the Maritime English Instructor. IAMU Journal 3: 85-93.
Trenkner, P., Cole, C.W. & Pritchard, B. (2007). Maritime English instruction- ensuring instructor’s competence. IBERICA, 14: 123-148.
Ziarati, R., Ziarati, M., & Çalbaş, B. (2009). Improving Safety at Sea and Ports by Developing Standards for Maritime English. In Bridge Conference, Finland.
