FROM CHAOS TO COHESION: ABILITY GROUPING, SOCIAL LOAFING, AND THE RISE OF DATA-DRIVEN GROUP FORMATION IN SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1163045

Keywords:

Academic Performance, Data-Driven Group Formation, Free-Riding, Secondary School, Social Loafing, Student Well Being, Within-Class Ability Grouping

Abstract

Group work in secondary school classrooms is consistently disrupted by three structural problems: unbalanced group formation, social loafing, and free riding. These problems undermine collaborative learning and burden teachers who rely on manual and unstructured grouping methods. The following research question is explored: What is the current evidence regarding within-class ability grouping, social loafing, and the development of data-driven group formation tools in secondary school and what are the implications for classroom practice? The objective is to systematically synthesise empirical evidence on these three areas and draw clear conclusions for secondary school educators and educational tool developers. A systematic search was conducted in SCOPUS and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2022 and 2026, written in English, and focused on ability grouping, social loafing, free-riding, academic performance, and student well-being at the secondary school level were included. 24 studies were included and analysed in five themes: ability grouping concepts, academic and psychological impacts, social loafing issues, and data-driven tools to create groups. The results indicate that ability grouping has a positive effect on achievement when it is well structured but has a negative effect when it is poorly structured and taught, leading to psychological harm and social loafing. An emerging trend toward algorithmic group formation tools is found that are superior to manual processes in achieving academic, demographic, and individual accountability. Based on the evidence presented in this review, it is concluded that secondary schools need to go beyond the manual grouping system and use evidence-based tools, which make the contribution of individual students visible, measurable and consequential to achieve true collaborative learning outcomes. This paper introduces BlendEdu, a novel contribution that is the first web-based, data-driven group formation tool specifically developed for secondary school classrooms, as a research-based intervention to end grouping chaos and create measurable classroom cohesion. 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anito, H. D., & Gaikwad, P. (2025). Students’ Perception of Ability Grouping in a Private International School. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2025.6.1.900

Ansar, M., Alwi, M. A., Fakhri, N., & Daud, M. (2023). The Influence of Task Difficulty Level on Academic Social Loafing. Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_141

Busso, M., & Frisancho, V. (2023). Ability Grouping and Student Performance: Experimental Evidence from Middle Schools in Mexico. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004716

Du, G. (2023). The Influence of Grouping Methods on the Free-Riding Behavior in Group Work. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 545–550. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-124-1_64

Forsell, J., Forslund Frykedal, K., Andersson, P., & Hammar Chiriac, E. (2024). Upper secondary school students’ perspectives on un/fairness in group work assessment. Research Papers in Education, 40(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2024.2378429

Gajderowicz, T., Jakubowski, M., Wrona, S., & Alkhadim, G. (2023). Is students’ teamwork a dreamwork? A new DCE-based multidimensional approach to preferences towards group work. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01641-x

Gedamu, A. D., & Shewangezaw, G. L. (2022). Secondary school teachers’ management and assessment strategies of free-riders in group work: implication for engaging the disengaged. Heliyon, 8(6), e09742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09742

John, J. G., Gopal, R., Singh, C. K. S., Yesupatham, K. M., & Pratama, H. (2023). Reaching Out to Group Contingencies in the ESL Classroom. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i1.5794

Kwak, M. (2025). The Effectiveness of AI-Driven Tools in Improving Student Learning Outcomes Compared to Traditional Methods. Issues in Information Systems, Volume 26(Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.48009/4_iis_2025_120

Largent, T. (2025). A systematic review of the impact of ability grouping on achieving SDG4 in mathematics education. Quality Education for All, 2(1), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/qea-12-2024-0154

Liang, C., Horikoshi, I., Majumdar, R., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2022). Exploring Predictive Indicators of Reading-Based Online Group Work for Group Formation Teaching Assistance. https://library.apsce.net/index.php/ICCE/article/view/4549

Liang, C., Horikoshi, I., Majumdar, R., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2023). Towards Predictable Process and Consequence Attributes of Data-Driven Group Work. Technology & Society, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202310_26(4).0006

Liang, C., Majumdar, R., Horikoshi, I., & Ogata, H. (2024). Data-Driven Support Infrastructure for Iterative Team-Based Learning. IEEE Access, 12, 65967–65980. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3393421

Liang, C., Majumdar, R., Nakamizo, Y., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2022). Algorithmic group formation and group work evaluation in a learning analytics-enhanced environment: implementation study in a Japanese junior high school. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(4), 1476–1499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2121730

Liang, C., Toyokawa, Y., Majumdar, R., Horikoshi, I., & Ogata, H. (2023). Group formation based on reading annotation data: system innovation and classroom practice. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(3), 667–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00274-y

Liang, C., Toyokawa, Y., & Ogata, H. (2025). Optimizing group formation with a mixed genetic algorithm: an empirical study in active reading using marker data. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20(4), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09452-9

Lwiza, S. (2025). Enhancing Academic Efficiency through Ability Grouping and Remedial Classes: The Cases of India and Vietnam. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.65085/2467-4745.1146

McGillicuddy, D. (2024). Ability grouping: The invisible hand shaping relational dynamics and wellbeing in education? Assessment and Development Matters, 16(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsadm.2024.16.2.7

Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2020). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

Özenç, Y., & Başaran, Y. (2025). Group Behaviors in Schools in the Context of Social Psychology. Jass Studies-the Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 18(104), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.78909

Padilla-Petry, P., Fantova-Romero, A., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J., & Argemí-Baldich, R. (2026). Improving students’ emotional well-being in an extracurricular activity: contrasting students’ and professionals’ views on an emotionally supportive learning environment. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102752

Wilkinson, S. D., & Penney, D. (2024). Students’ preferences for setting and/or mixed‐ability grouping in secondary school physical education in England. British Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 1804–1830. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4000

Xie, T., & Yu, J. (2026). Innovation-driven group composition for effective collaborative programming: integrating multi-evidences of teacher, student, and peer assessments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-026-09469-8

Yasin, B., Burhan, O. K., Mustafa, F., Fata, I. A., & Komariah, E. (2025). STUDENT CONTRIBUTION INDEX (SCI) IN SCIENCE: A MEASURE OF CONTRIBUTION TO MITIGATING SOCIAL LOAFING AND FREE-RIDING IN TEAM PROJECTS. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(3), 1066–1078. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.42064

Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). Promoting High-Achieving Students Through Differentiated Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms—A Systematic Review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 540–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x221112931

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Chen , C. H., & Mohaiyuddin, N. (2026). FROM CHAOS TO COHESION: ABILITY GROUPING, SOCIAL LOAFING, AND THE RISE OF DATA-DRIVEN GROUP FORMATION IN SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELLING (IJEPC), 11(63), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1163045