CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES ON DIGITAL COMMUNICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN MALAYSIA AND IRAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.831020Keywords:
Communication Competence, Digital Communication, Digital Fatigue, Higher EducationAbstract
The rapid evolution of digital technologies has transformed professional communication in higher education, enabling academic staff to collaborate efficiently across departments and geographic boundaries. In Malaysia and Iran, the integration of digital tools such as video conferencing platforms, email systems and collaborative applications has become essential for managing academic and administrative tasks. However, challenges such as digital fatigue, communication overload and gaps in digital competencies have emerged, affecting productivity and staff well-being. This study employs a qualitative research design using semi-structured interviews with four academic professionals from both countries to investigate the experiences, communication skills and coping strategies associated with digital communication. Thematic analysis identified key themes such as communication preferences, digital fatigue, competence disparities and institutional support. The study highlights both shared and divergent challenges and provides practical recommendations for improving digital communication practices in higher education.
Downloads
References
Adekola, J., Dale, V. H. M., & Gardiner, K. (2017). Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 25. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1973
Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Aldossari, H. S. (2020). Faculty's perceptions of using WhatsApp in academic advising. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10009-6
Alghamdi, E. A., & Aldossari, R. M. (2020). Digital communication trends in Saudi higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4787–4802.
Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2021). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Crosling, G., Heagney, M., & Thomas, L. (2021). A study of the use of blended learning/online learning tools in a higher education institution in an ASEAN country. Journal of Educators Online, 18(2), 22–37.
Dahabiyeh, L., Najjar, M. S., & Wang, G. (2022). Online teaching during COVID-19 crisis: The role of technostress and emotional dissonance on online teaching exhaustion and teaching staff productivity. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(2), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-09-2021-0147
Day, A., Scott, N., & Kelloway, E. K. (2021). Information and communication technology: Implications for job stress and employee well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 38, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.004
Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Smartphone use, work–home interference and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied Psychology, 63(3), 411–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00530.x
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Fatima, N., & Qureshi, S. (2022). Digital fatigue in academia: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 45–59.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Lane, J. N., Leonardi, P. M., Contractor, N. S., & DeChurch, L. A. (2024). Teams in the digital workplace: Technology’s role for communication, collaboration and performance. Small Group Research, 55(1), 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964231200015
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
Menzies, R., & Zarb, M. (2020). Professional communication tools in higher education: A case study in implementing Slack in the curriculum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–17.
Naim, S. M. (2023). The practice of pedagogical digital competence among ESL lecturers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(2), 154-172.
Naim, S. M., & Razak, N. A. (2020). Effect of personal and professional characteristics towards ESL lecturers’ digital competence. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4), 1029–1049.
Naim, S. M., & Razak, N. A. (2020). ESL lecturers’ digital competence in Malaysian higher education institutions. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(2), 415–425.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Spataro, J. J., & Bloch, J. (2018). Overwhelmed by digital communication? Here's what to do. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/06/overwhelmed-by-digital-communication-heres-what-to-do
Strauss, C., Harr, M. D., & Pieper, T. M. (2025). Analyzing digital communication: A comprehensive literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75, 3119–3157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00455-8
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). A comprehensive framework for teacher professional development: The importance of teacher beliefs and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
Zheng, M., Asif, M., Tufail, M. S., Naseer, S., Khokhar, S. G., Chen, X., & Naveed, R. T. (2022). COVID academic pandemic: Techno stress faced by teaching staff for online academic activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895371
