A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF AGROPRENEURIAL INTENTION: INSIGHTS FROM MALAYSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.827008Keywords:
Agribusiness Development, Agropreneurial Intention, Agropreneurship, Entrepreneurship Education, Graduate Entrepreneurship, Higher Education, University SupportAbstract
Agriculture remains a vital sector in Malaysia, contributing significantly to food security, employment, and economic sustainability. However, the declining interest among graduates in agro-based ventures poses challenges to the sector’s long-term viability. Agropreneurship, which integrates entrepreneurial principles within agriculture, offers a promising solution to revitalize the industry through innovation and market-driven strategies. This paper develops a conceptual framework examining the influence of agropreneurial curriculum content, agropreneurship experiential learning, and perceived university support on agropreneurial intention, with perceived desirability and perceived feasibility acting as mediators. Grounded in entrepreneurial learning theory and institutional support theory, the proposed framework underscores the significance of structured education, practical exposure, and institutional backing in shaping graduates' aspirations to engage in agribusiness ventures. Recent statistics indicate that Malaysia recorded 1,030,020 agricultural holders, with 97.9% being individual agricultural holders, highlighting the need for entrepreneurial education to sustain the sector. Additionally, findings from the 2024 Agricultural Census suggest that modernizing agricultural education and support systems could enhance the feasibility of agropreneurial careers. By integrating these elements, this study offers insights into how higher education institutions can enhance agropreneurial competencies and encourage graduates to pursue careers in agro-based businesses. Future empirical research should validate the framework to measure its impact on graduates' entrepreneurial aspirations.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, N., Wahab, S., & Khalid, R. (2018). Developing agropreneurial competencies among Malaysian graduates. Journal of Agribusiness Education, 15(2), 67–80.
Ambad, S. N. A., Zainudin, A. I., & Mas’od, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial intention among Malaysian youth: The mediating effect of perceived feasibility and desirability. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 32–44.
Ambad, S. N. A., Ismail, A. H., & Ramlan, R. (2022). Psychological readiness and agropreneurial intention: A vocational orientation approach. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 45–56.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company.
Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 149–159.
Chukwuani, G. (2025). AI ethics in financial audits: Accountability and transparency in algorithmic decisions. Journal of Accounting Innovation, 18(2), 23–37.
Guerrero, M., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 35–50.
Hussain, M., Ismail, H., & Rahman, A. (2020). The role of agropreneurship in Malaysia’s economic transformation. Asian Journal of Agricultural Innovation, 7(1), 45–60.
Jaafar, N. M., Salleh, F. M., & Karim, N. A. (2023). Determinants of sustainable agropreneurship among B40 rural communities in Malaysia. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 57–70.
Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. H. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 115–122.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Krueger, N. F. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21.
Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91–104.
Lehner, O. M., Nicholls, A., & Honig, B. (2022). Ethics and accountability in AI-driven finance. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(2), 301–318.
Meghashree, R., & Bhata, V. (2022). Incubator-based entrepreneurship education in Malaysia: A case study. Malaysian Journal of Business & Technology, 6(2), 58–66.
Moghavvemi, S., Sharabani, A., & Lee, H. (2017). Bias in algorithmic accounting tools: A conceptual review. Journal of Technological Accounting, 5(4), 75–89.
Mohd, Z., Farid, S., & Amin, N. (2021). Agricultural sustainability and entrepreneurship in Malaysia. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 26(4), 102–117.
PwC. (2021). AI in finance: Balancing automation with accountability. PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Rasiah, R., Yusof, N. A., & Ismail, I. (2019). Accelerating entrepreneurship education: Lessons from Malaysia. Journal of Economic Policy and Innovation, 9(2), 88–95.
Razak, M., Latiff, F., & Hashim, N. (2019). University support and agropreneurial intention: A Malaysian perspective. Entrepreneurial Studies Journal, 9(3), 88–105.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Subhan, A. Q., Anuar, M. A., & Noor, N. M. (2019). Entrepreneurial mindset formation among university students: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 42–53.
Sulistyorini, D., & Santoso, B. (2021). The effect of entrepreneurial education on entrepreneurial intention: Perceived desirability and feasibility as mediators. Indonesian Journal of Entrepreneurship Studies, 3(1), 23–31.
University of Melbourne. (2023). AI and financial ethics: Bridging regulation and innovation in Australia. Centre for AI Policy.
Yang, L., & Yu, Z. (2022). Institutional support and student entrepreneurship: An empirical study from ASEAN universities. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 11(1), 15–27.
Zhao, Y., & Li, B. (2019). Governance in algorithmic systems: An ethical review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Society, 17(3), 122–140.
Zysman, J., & Kenney, M. (2018). The next phase in the digital revolution: Platforms, innovation, and governance. Communications of the ACM, 61(4), 54–63.
