BEYOND AUDIT AUTOMATION: MAPPING THE EMERGING LANDSCAPE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH IN AUDITING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.828030

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Auditing, Bibliometric Analysis, Machine Learning

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is swiftly reshaping the auditing profession by strengthening audit efficiency, elevating the ability to detect fraud, and supporting more data-driven decision-making processes. Although there is growing scholarly interest in AI applications within auditing, the existing literature remains fragmented across multiple disciplines, resulting in a limited understanding of thematic evolution, intellectual structure, as well as the patterns of international research collaboration within the field. Accordingly, this study seeks to deliver an extensive bibliometric examination of AI scholarship within auditing published between 2006 and 2025. Using a PRISMA-informed screening approach, bibliographic records were extracted from the Scopus database via a sophisticated search strategy incorporating keywords associated with artificial intelligence and auditing. After applying systematic inclusion and exclusion criteria, a final corpus comprising 597 journal articles was selected for analytical purposes. The study employed Scopus Analyzer, OpenRefine, and VOSviewer software to examine publication trends, citation structures, co-authorship networks, as well as patterns of keyword co-occurrence. The results indicate a pronounced exponential upsurge in research on AI auditing, particularly after 2020, reflecting the increasing adoption of digital technologies within audit practices. The United States stood out as the leading contributor in publication volume, citation influence, and the robustness of international collaborative networks, with the United Kingdom and China ranking subsequently in that order. Keyword co-occurrence analysis further demonstrated that the field has evolved beyond technical automation themes toward broader discussions involving governance, explainability, ethical accountability, generative AI, and human–AI collaboration. Highly cited studies also indicate a strong interdisciplinary orientation integrating accounting, information systems, governance, and business ethics perspectives. Overall, this study delivers a structured and comprehensive examination of the intellectual evolution and developing research trajectories of artificial intelligence within the auditing field, yielding meaningful insights for scholars, practitioners, regulators, and policymakers aiming to facilitate the responsible and efficient incorporation of AI into auditing contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Khoury, A., Hussein, S. A., Abdulwhab, M., Aljuboori, Z. M., Haddad, H., Ali, M. A., Abed, I. A., & Flayyih, H. H. (2022). Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811615

Almufadda, G., & Almezeini, N. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Auditing Profession: A Literature Review. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2020-083

Altundağ, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Based Audit Software: Today’s Realities and Future Vision. Denetişim. https://doi.org/10.58348/denetisim.1512650

Alves, J. L., Borges, I. B., & De Nadae, J. (2021). Sustainability in complex projects of civil construction: Bibliometric and bibliographic review. Gestao e Producao, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389

Anica-Popa, I. F., Vrîncianu, M., Anica-Popa, L. E., Cișmașu, I. D., & Tudor, C. G. (2024). Framework for Integrating Generative AI in Developing Competencies for Accounting and Audit Professionals. Electronics (Switzerland), 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13132621

Antwi, B. O., Adelakun, B. O., Fatogun, D. T., & Olaiya, O. P. (2024). Enhancing audit accuracy: The role of AI in detecting financial anomalies and fraud. Finance & Accounting Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v6i6.1235

Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0

Arsyad, I., Kharisma, D. B., & Wiwoho, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence and Islamic finance industry: problems and oversight. International Journal of Law and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2024-0236

Assyakur, D. S., & Rosa, E. M. (2022). Spiritual Leadership in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Aisyah : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v7i2.914

Bedué, P., & Fritzsche, A. (2022). Can we trust AI? An empirical investigation of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(2), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2020-0233

Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3449287

di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Veronay, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq027

Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. In International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 162, pp. 101–114). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003

Falco, G., Shneiderman, B., Badger, J., Carrier, R., Dahbura, A., Danks, D., Eling, M., Goodloe, A., Gupta, J., Hart, C., Jirotka, M., Johnson, H., LaPointe, C., Llorens, A., Mackworth, A., Maple, C., Pálsson, S., Pasquale, F., Winfield, A., & Yeong, Z. K. (2021). Governing AI safety through independent audits. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00370-7

Fedyk, A., Hodson, J., Khimich, N., & Fedyk, T. (2022). Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 938–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x

Ganapathy, V. (2023). AI in Auditing: A Comprehensive Review of Applications, Benefits and Challenges. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(04), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7643

Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data and Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945

Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020). Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614

Gu, D., Li, T., Wang, X., Yang, X., & Yu, Z. (2019). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of electronic health and telemedicine research. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.007

Hajek, P., & Henriques, R. (2017). Mining corporate annual reports for intelligent detection of financial statement fraud – A comparative study of machine learning methods. Knowledge-Based Systems, 128, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.05.001

Han, H., Shiwakoti, R. K., Jarvis, R., Mordi, C., & Botchie, D. (2023). Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100598

Hasan, A. R. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Accounting & Auditing: A Literature Review. Open Journal of Business and Management, 10(01), 440–465. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2022.101026

Ivakhnenkov, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence application in auditing. Scientific Papers NaUKMA. Economics. https://doi.org/10.18523/2519-4739.2023.8.1.54-60

Kassar, M., & Jizi, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence and robotic process automation in auditing and accounting: a systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-05-2024-0175

Khiste, G. P., & Paithankar, R. R. (2017). Analysis of Bibliometric term in Scopus. International Research Journal, 01(32), 78–83.

Kokina, J., Blanchette, S., Davenport, T. H., & Pachamanova, D. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing: Evidence from the field. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56, 100734.

Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. (2017). The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence: How Automation is Changing Auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51730

Koreff, J., Baudot, L., & Sutton, S. G. (2023). Exploring the impact of technology dominance on audit professionalism through data analytic-driven healthcare audits. Journal of Information Systems, 37(3), 59–80.

Li, Y., & Goel, S. (2025a). Artificial intelligence auditability and auditor readiness for auditing artificial intelligence systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100739

Li, Y., & Goel, S. (2025b). Bridging IT auditors and AI auditing: Understanding pathways to effective IT audits of AI-driven processes. Advances in Accounting, 69, 100842.

Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751

Munoko, I., Brown-Liburd, H. L., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2020). The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04407-1

Özbaltan, N. (2024). Applying Machine Learning to Audit Data: Enhancing Fraud Detection, Risk Assessment and Audit Efficiency. EDPACS, 69, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2024.2376793

Seethamraju, R., & Hecimovic, A. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Management, 48(4), 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221108440

Suyono, W. P., Puspa, E. S., Anugrah, S., & Firnanda, R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: A Systematic Review of Tools, Applications, and Challenges. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1024

Tanbour, K. M., Ben Saada, M., Nour, A. I., & Elnaas, N. K. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into risk management frameworks: a mixed-methods analysis of the Palestinian banking sector. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1–42.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems, 15(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004911

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083

Wang, S., Wang, J., Wang, X., Qiu, T., Yuan, Y., Ouyang, L., Guo, Y., & Wang, F.-Y. (2018). Blockchain-Powered Parallel Healthcare Systems Based on the ACP Approach. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5(4), 942–950. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2018.2865526

Wu, Y. C. J., & Wu, T. (2017). A decade of entrepreneurship education in the Asia Pacific for future directions in theory and practice. In Management Decision (Vol. 55, Number 7, pp. 1333–1350). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518

Zahmatkesh, S., & Rezazadeh, J. (2017). The effect of auditor features on audit quality. Tékhne, 15(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2017.09.003

Downloads

Published

2026-06-21

How to Cite

Jeyaram, S., Abdullah, D. F., Shollunayagam, R. M., Lim, J., & Suhaimi, S. M. (2026). BEYOND AUDIT AUTOMATION: MAPPING THE EMERGING LANDSCAPE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH IN AUDITING. ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SME’S (AIJBES), 8(28), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.828030