EXPLORING SELF-EFFICACY AMONG UNDERGRADUATES LEARNING MANDARIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1163015Keywords:
Language Acquisition, Mandarin Skills, Production Self-Efficacy, Reception Self-EfficacyAbstract
The increasing global importance of Mandarin has led to a rise in student enrolment in Mandarin language learning. However, learner success depends on both the quality of instruction and psychological factors like self-efficacy. In the context of language acquisition, self-efficacy plays a crucial role in determining how well someone understands language (listening and reading) and how effectively they produce language (speaking and writing). Theoretically, self-efficacy acts as a central mediator of learner agency, influencing the intensity of effort and the degree of persistence maintained when facing linguistic obstacles. High efficacy beliefs are strong predictors of language learning motivation and the proactive employment of self-regulated learning strategies. Conversely, low self-efficacy can trigger avoidance behaviors and heighten foreign language anxiety, serving as a precursor to academic burnout. This study contributes to the field by addressing the lack of research on the dual framework of accepting and producing self-efficacy within a single pedagogical context. Understanding these aspects of self-efficacy offers valuable insights for developing effective learning strategies and curriculum. This study examines the relationship between reception self-efficacy and production self-efficacy in 145 Malaysian undergraduates at the beginning of their Mandarin language learning. The scope of this investigation is limited to the early-stage psychological profiles of these students, focusing on different tasks during the learning of Mandarin. The instrument used is a structured questionnaire comprising three sections: demographic information, reception self-efficacy, and production self-efficacy. The findings show that learners generally perceive their self-efficacy in Mandarin as low to moderate across all four Mandarin language skills: listening, reading, speaking, and writing. This indicates a pervasive lack of high confidence in their receptive and productive abilities. It is important to address the task where learners feel most insecure, tailoring support to improve their perceived competence in Mandarin skills.
Downloads
References
Aijia Guo & Supinda Lertlit (2021) The Impact of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning on Chinese Vocabulary of the Third-Year Thai Students at a Private University. Rangsit Journal of Educational Studies Vol.8, No.2, pp.1-14.
Akram, H., Junaid, M., & Yang, Y. (2019). Relationship between self-efficacy and Chinese language speaking anxiety of international students at Northeast normal university. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(2), 26-32.
An, Z., Wang, C., Li, S., Gan, Z., & Li, H. (2021). Technology-assisted self-regulated English language learning: Associations with English language self-efficacy, English enjoyment, and learning outcomes. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 558466.
Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2023). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 27(2), 207–228.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Chen, C. (2021). An Exploration of College Students’ Self-Efficacy and Characteristics of Good Language Learners in Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Pacific).
Fallah, G., Namaziandost, E., & Hosseini, S. A. (2020). The effect of flipped classroom approach on EFL learners' self-efficacy and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-10.
Graham, S. (2022). Self-efficacy and language learning–what it is and what it isn't. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186-207.
Henderson, M., Huang, H., Grant, S., & Henderson, L. (2012). The impact of Chinese language lessons in a virtual world on university students' self-efficacy beliefs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(3).
Jackson,S.L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning.
Ju, S. Y., Yusuf, M., Lai, T. T., & Mei, S. Y. (2022). Explore the role of self-efficacy and anxiety in MFL achievement at public universities in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 813–823.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Kutuk, G., Putwain, D. W., Kaye, L. K., & Garrett, B. (2022). Relations between gender stereotyping and foreign language attainment: The mediating role of language learners’ anxiety and self‐efficacy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12446
Latorre-Cosculluela, C., et al. (2024). The role of flipped learning approach in developing learners’ self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1001283.
Lim, H. W. (2024). An exploratory factor analysis examining Mandarin as a foreign language learners’ self-efficacy at Malaysian public universities. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 9(1), 45–60.
Ozer, O., & Akcayoglu, D. İ. (2021). Examining the roles of self-efficacy beliefs, self-regulated learning and foreign language anxiety in the academic achievement of tertiary EFL learners. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 357-372
Rahmat, N. H. ., Sukimin, I. S. ., Sim, M. S. ., Anuar, M. ., & Mohandas, E. S. (2021). Online Learning Motivation and Satisfaction: A Case Study of Undergraduates vs Postgraduates. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 11(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.112.88.97
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). Guilford Press.
Shengyao, Y., Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, H., Mengshi, Y., Minqin, C., Xuefen, L., & Mustafa, Z. (2024). Academic resilience, self-efficacy, and motivation: the role of parenting style. Scientific reports, 14(1), 5571.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Waddington, J. (2023). Self-efficacy. ELT Journal, 77(2), 237-240.
Wang, C., Bai, B., & Nie, Y. (2021). The relationship between technological self-efficacy and acceptance of AI-based tools in English speaking instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 208–221.
Xie, X. (2012). Speaking anxiety among Chinese language learners: Causes and strategies. Chinese Language Teaching, 3(1), 45–60.
Yang, L. (2024). An Empirical Study of the Relationship between General Self-efficacy, Chinese Character Learning Anxiety, and Learning Burnout among International Students in China.
Yao, Y., Zhu, X., Zhu, S., & Jiang, Y. (2023). The impacts of self-efficacy on undergraduate students’ perceived task value and task performance of L1 Chinese integrated writing: A mixed-method research. Assessing Writing, 55, 100687.
Yap, N. T., & Wong, B. E. (2021). Language learning strategies and language self-efficacy: Investigating the relationship in Malaysia. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(3), 245–269.
Zhang, L. J. (2020). A systematic review of Chinese language learning strategies in the past decade (2011–2020). Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–15.
Zhang, S., & Lynch, R. (2021). The relationship of self-efficacy for Chinese as foreign language oral skills and the use of indirect language learning strategies for learning Chinese as a foreign language with oral skills achievement of Grade 6 students in Chinese as a foreign language class at Satit Prasarnmit Elementary School in Bangkok, Thailand. Scholar: Human Sciences, 13(1), 105-120.
Zhou, Q., Chen, L., & Hou, X. (2022). Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing from sources: Self-efficacy and performance. Assessing writing, 54, 100663.
