STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS CHATGPT AS A LEARNING ASSISTANT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1163058Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, AI Learning Assistant, ChatGPT, Behavioral Intention, Students’ Attitudes, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)Abstract
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has transformed teaching and learning practices in higher education institutions. Among all, ChatGPT has gained widespread attention as a learning assistant capable of supporting academic writing, idea generation, research assistance as well as personalised learning. Despite its increasing use among university students, concerns regarding academic integrity, reliability of information, ethical usage, and overdependence on AI technologies continue to raise questions about students’ acceptance and attitudes towards ChatGPT in educational settings. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the influence of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on attitudes as well as the influence of attitudes on behavioral intention to use ChatGPT as a learning assistant among students in higher education institutions. A quantitative cross-sectional research design was employed using a survey method. Data were collected from 250 undergraduate students from public and private higher education institutions in Malaysia through an online questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The measurement items were adapted from previous validated studies and assessed using a five-point Likert scale. Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS. The findings revealed that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly influenced students’ attitudes towards ChatGPT as a learning assistant. In addition, students’ attitudes significantly influenced behavioural intention to use ChatGPT for academic purposes. The structural model explained 68.7% of the variance in behavioural intention. The findings indicate that students generally hold positive attitudes towards ChatGPT and perceive the technology as useful, accessible, and supportive of learning activities. The study contributes to the growing literature on AI adoption in higher education by extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) within the context of AI-powered conversational learning tools.
Downloads
References
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2022). Technology acceptance model in educational contexts: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1–29.
Alshammari, S. H., & Babu, E. (2025). The mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and students’ behavioural intention to use ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 15, 7169.
Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwan, A. A., Rana, N. P., Kizgin, H., & Patil, P. (2019). Consumer use of mobile banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an integrated model. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 38-52.
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative Ai. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1-9.
Creswell, J. W. & J. David Creswell. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22–38.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M. & Wamba, S. F. (2023). Opinion paper: So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460-474.
Firat, M. (2023). How ChatGPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. Open Praxis, 15(1), 1–12.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Jamieson, V. A., & Fuchs, K. (2024). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model (eTAM) to determine university students’ behavioral intentions of ChatGPT: An empirical study from Thailand. Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 19(2).
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F. & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 1-13.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.
Pham, L., Klaus, T., & Bateh, J. (2025). Key factors influencing intention to use ChatGPT: An empirical study of U.S. students. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105516.
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2023). Higher Education Digitalisation and Education 5.0 Strategic Framework. Putrajaya: Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.
Rahim, N. A., Hamzah, M. I., & Abdullah, N. (2024). University students’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence tools in learning environments. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 85–104.
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887.
Stroud, R., & Du, J. (2025). Student acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A mixed-method study of attitudes, intentions, and concerns. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 1–14.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-24.
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN Electronic Journal, 70(6), 1-9
