DEVELOPING A RESILIENCE DESIGN CHECKLIST FOR SCHOOL-BASED DISASTER EVACUATION CENTRES IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.829049Keywords:
Disaster Resilience, Disaster Risk Reduction, School-Based Evacuation Centres, Shelter DesignAbstract
Schools in Malaysia are frequently designated as temporary disaster evacuation centres during floods, landslides, and other climate-related hazards due to their accessibility and community familiarity. However, many schools were not originally designed to function as emergency shelters, resulting in challenges such as overcrowding, inadequate sanitation, limited accessibility, and insufficient space functionality. These shortcomings compromise evacuee safety, dignity, and well-being, particularly among vulnerable groups such as children, older persons, and persons with disabilities. This study aims to address these gaps by developing a Resilience Design Checklist for School-Based Disaster Evacuation Centres in Malaysia. The research adopts a qualitative approach through document analysis of national policies (NADMA, MKN, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health) and international standards (Sphere Standards, Sendai Framework, IASC Guidelines). This is complemented by space provision assessment and content analysis using a structured questionnaire covering fifteen key design domains, including structural safety, space allocation, sanitation, accessibility, health and safety, education continuity, and sustainability. Findings reveal the absence of standardised minimum shelter design criteria and the prevalence of ad hoc adaptation of school facilities during emergencies. The proposed checklist translates international standards into a practical, context-sensitive tool that can guide assessment, retrofitting, and preparedness planning for Malaysian schools. This innovation supports Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 3, SDG 4, and SDG 11) and contributes towards building resilient, inclusive, and disaster-ready communities.
Downloads
References
Bosher, L., & Dainty, A. (2020). Disaster risk reduction and “built-in” resilience: Towards overarching principles for construction practice. Disasters, 44(2), 227–247.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chan, N. W. (2021). Impacts of disasters and disaster risk management in Malaysia: The case of floods. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59, 102247.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
IASC. (2021). Guidelines on the protection of displaced populations in emergency shelters. Inter-Agency Standing Committee.
Karakose, T., Tulubas, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023). The scientific evolution of social justice leadership in education: Structural and longitudinal analysis of the existing knowledge base (2003–2022). Frontiers in Education, 8, 1139648.
Nadzir, N., Ibrahim, A., & Yusoff, N. (2022). Flood disaster management and community resilience in Malaysia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77, 103085.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29.
Rahman, M. M., Sakurai, A., & Shaw, R. (2021). Flood evacuation shelters and risk management: Lessons from Southeast Asia. Progress in Disaster Science, 10, 100161.
Shaw, R., Shiwaku, K., Kobayashi, H., & Kobayashi, M. (2020). Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 29(3), 295–308.
Sphere Association. (2021). The Sphere handbook: Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response.
Ugras, H., Ugras, M., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). ChatGPT-supported education in primary schools: The potential of ChatGPT for sustainable practices. Sustainability, 16(22), 9855.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2020). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030.
Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., Tulubas, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023). A bibliometric review of mentoring for the professional development of school administrators. Sustainability, 15(4), 3027.
