THE PARADOX OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION: HOW INCREASING DATA CENTER ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR DIGITAL LOGISTICS AFFECTS NET-ZERO GOALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/JTHEM.1143015Keywords:
Carbon Footprint, Data Center Energy, Digital Logistics, Digital Sustainability, Net-Zero Goals, Renewable EnergyAbstract
The rapid evolution of digital technologies in supply chains and logistics domains is widely regarded as an enabler of achieving global and corporate net-zero visions. However, this vision overlooks a fundamental paradox: the carbon and energy cost of the digital infrastructure (e.g., artificial intelligence, data centers, and cloud computing) required to make these efficiencies affordable is massive and rising exponentially. This study introduces a new theoretical approach to quantitatively examine this "digital sustainability paradox." We develop a discrete-event simulation model of a multi-echelon supply chain to compare the quantity of carbon reduced by optimizing logistic operations with that of the carbon emissions caused by the enabling digital infrastructure. Our scenario analysis reveals that while digital transformation always increases operational effectiveness, overall carbon impact may not necessarily be minimized. The study's most significant discovery is that the environmental benefits of digital logistics are very much contingent upon the source of energy powering the data centers. We demonstrate that without substituting to renewable power for digital equipment, carbon reductions from efficiency improvements are largely reversed, and in some cases, the total carbon footprint increases. This research provides 3a critical and integrated perspective on the green implications of digitalization, providing actionable policy recommendations for policymakers and practitioners to ride out this paradox and guide a truly sustainable digital future.
Downloads
References
Accounting, A. C. (2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Washington, DC, USA.
Ahmed, K. M., Bollen, M. H., & Alvarez, M. (2021). A review of data centers energy consumption and reliability modeling. IEEE Access, 9, 152536-152563. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.312509
Alsamhi, S. H., Ma, O., Ansari, M. S., & Meng, Q. (2019). Greening Internet of things for greener and smarter cities: A survey and future prospects. Telecommunication Systems, 72(4), 609-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-019-00597-1
Bjørn, A., Lloyd, S., & Matthews, D. (2021). From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: Evaluation of seven methods for setting ‘science-based’ emission targets. Environmental Research Letters, 16(5), 054019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe57b
Goel, A., Masurkar, S., & Pathade, G. (2024). An overview of digital transformation and environmental sustainability: Threats, opportunities and solutions. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.2340.v1
Hsu, C., Choon Tan, K., Hanim Mohamad Zailani, S., & Jayaraman, V. (2013). Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(6), 656-688. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-10-2011-0401
Huang, Y. A., Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. 2009. Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon Footprinting. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(22), 8509-8515. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901643a
IEA. (2024). Energy demand from AI – Energy and AI – Analysis. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai/energy-demand-from-ai
Liu, C., Yin, L., Li, Y., & Hao, Y. (2025). Comparative analysis of activity-based and spend-based methods for scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions calculation. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium in Environmental Science and Industrial Ecology, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1578-0_18
Ojadi, J. O., Odionu, C. S., Onukwulu, E. C., & Owulade, O. A. (2024). Big data analytics and AI for optimizing supply chain sustainability and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in logistics and transportation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(1), 1536-1548. https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2024.5.1.1536-1548
Pal, S. (2023). Revolutionizing warehousing: Unleashing the power of machine learning in multi-product demand forecasting. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(10), 615-619. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.56041
Paramesha, M., Rane, N., & Rane, J. (2024). Big data analytics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, Internet of things, and blockchain for enhanced business intelligence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4855856
Silkoset, R., & Nygaard, A. (2025). Leveraging blockchain and smart contracts to combat greenwashing in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5874-5889. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3431
Singh, B. (2025). Revolutionizing supply chains for optimized demand planning, inventory management, and logistics. Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage, 103-128. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4433-0.ch005
Stroumpoulis, A., & Kopanaki, E. (2022). Theoretical perspectives on sustainable supply chain management and digital transformation: A literature review and a conceptual framework. Sustainability, 14(8), 4862. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084862
Synesgy. (2025). IoT device: How it can help to reduce your business emissions. Synesgy | The ESG platform for companies. https://www.synesgy.com/en/esg-guide/iot-device-how-it-can-help-to-reduce-your-business-emissions/
TODESCHINI, S. (2024). The corporate sustainability reporting directive and the EU member states: Searching for effectiveness in some national policies for transposition – a comparative analysis. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 1, 981-990. https://doi.org/10.2495/sdp240811
Uptime Institute. (2021). 2021 Data Center Survey. Uptime Institute.
Vazquez Melendez, E. I., Bergey, P., & Smith, B. (2024). Blockchain technology for supply chain provenance: Increasing supply chain efficiency and consumer trust. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(4), 706-730. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-08-2023-0383
Yu, J., & Hu, W. (2024). The impact of digital infrastructure construction on carbon emission efficiency: Considering the role of central cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448 141687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141687
