CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR VISUALIZATION-ENHANCED DAO GOVERNANCE IN COOPERATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.1142011Keywords:
Blockchain Governance, Cognitive Fit Theory, Cooperatives, DAO Adoption, Data Visualization, Design Principles, TrustAbstract
Cooperatives continuously faced governance challenges related to transparency, accountability, and member participation as decision-making processes became more complex. Hence, it was proposed that blockchain-based Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) could serve as a governance mechanism. Despite this potential, DAO governance systems remained difficult for many cooperative members to trust, adopt, and interpret. This is even more so when the governance processes involve technically complex blockchain information. Therefore, this study aims to develop a set of conceptual design principles to explain how visualization can support trustworthy DAO governance in a cooperative. This study adopted a design-oriented conceptual approach. Focusing on Cognitive Fit Theory and Trust Theory, and current research on blockchain governance and cooperative decision-making, this paper depicts how visualization functions as a cognitive mechanism that drives members’ understanding of governance processes and outcomes. The analysis identified six key principles, which included emphasized interpretability over technical completeness, cognitive load reduction, process visibility, inclusivity, and trust support in visualization-based DAO governance. These principles highlighted that transparency in blockchain was not achieved only through data availability, but via visual presentation of governance information in forms that align with users’ cognitive processing capabilities. This paper contributed to the body of knowledge involving digital governance and blockchain adoption by offering theory-informed design knowledge that extends beyond the technology acceptance model. The proposed design principles provide a foundation for future research and offer practical guidance for organizations and system developers in supporting inclusive, understandable, and trustworthy DAO-based governance in cooperatives.
Downloads
References
Cabouat, A. F. (2024). A cognitive load approach to designing and evaluating data visualizations (Doctoral dissertation, Universite Paris Cite).
Ghanmi, H. A., Ahmadjee, S., & Bahsoon, R. (2025). Evaluating the Need for Explanations in Blockchain Smart Contracts to Reconcile Surprises. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 34(8), 1-35.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS quarterly, 213-236.
Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS quarterly, 337-355.
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS review, 10(1), 18-26.
Lindner, F., Reiner, G., & Keil, S. (2025). A behavioral perspective on visualization in manufacturing and operations management: a review, framework, and research agenda. Operations Management Research, 18(1), 317-352.
Lustenberger, M., Wollenschläger, S., & Küng, L. (2025). DAO as digital governance tool for collaborative housing. Frontiers in Blockchain, 8, 1523951
Mannes, S., Beuren, I. M., & Silva, E. S. D. (2022). Cooperative behavior and knowledge sharing: interaction of risk management. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24, 692-707.
Neri, G., Marshall, S., Chan, H. K. H., Yaghi, A., Tabor, D., Sinha, R., & Mazumdar, S. (2025). Data visualization in AI-assisted decision-making: a systematic review. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1605655.
Obidallah, W. J., Rashideh, W., Kamaruddeen, A. M., Alzahrani, T., Alduraywish, Y., Alsahli, A., & Alshuqayran, N. (2024). Beyond the hype: A TAM-based analysis of blockchain adoption drivers in construction industry. Heliyon, 10(19).
Polcumpally, A. T., Pandey, K. K., Kumar, A., & Samadhiya, A. (2024). Blockchain governance and trust: A multi-sector thematic systematic review and exploration of future research directions. Heliyon, 10(12)
Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2012). Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS quarterly, 21-42.
Saadan, N., Khairi, K. F., Ahmad, A., & Tahir, A. M. (2024, December). A Thematic Review on Blockchain Suitability in Inter-Organisational Collaboration Workflow In E-Payment Process in the Malaysian Public Sector. In IECON: International Economics and Business Conference (Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1321-1343).
Santana, C., & Albareda, L. (2022). Blockchain and the emergence of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs): An integrative model and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121806.
Silva, R. P., Saraiva, C., & Mamede, H. S. (2022). Assessment of organizational readiness for digital transformation in SMEs. Procedia Computer Science, 204, 362-369.
Wallbach, S., Lehner, R., Roethke, K., Elbert, R., & Benlian, A. (2020). Trust-building effects of Blockchain features–an empirical analysis of immutability, traceability and anonymity.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.
